Topic: The charts below show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia in October 2009 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The chart gives information about the proportion of water level in six metropolitan areas in Australia recorded in October between 2009 and 2010.
As can be seen, it is apparent that almost all Australian cities increased the level of water after an examined year, the opposite was true for Darwin city, except for Brisbane, where there was no change recorded. Noticeably, Canberra replaced Sydney city to become the most prominent water level among the six cities at the end of the mentioned period.
Looking at the chart, in October 2009, Sydney took the lead, surpassing other cities to witness the highest water level roughly 80 percent. This percentage also nearly doubled and was four times greater than the water proportion compared to Perth and Melbourne respectively. Having less than a tiny fraction of the water level in comparison to Sydney, Canberra was the second area containing abundant water in reservoirs. Meanwhile, both Darwin and Brisbane held fluctuated around 50 percent, with 45 percent for the former and 58 percent for the latter.
After a year, the ratio of water level in Sydney increased slightly to just over 80 percent, whereas the water ratio in Canberra witnessed a considerable increase to reach a peak at merely 100 percent. The same trend was observed regarding Melbourne and Perth, both water levels in the two cities rose over twice times as greater as the portion in the previous year, with 40% and 70%, respectively. In contrast, there was recorded a downward trend when it came to the water level of Darwin, standing at approximately a quarter. In addition, the percentage of Brisbane remained stable throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability while others think we should educate all students together Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11678832117 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65595153076 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1934856111 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203952825663 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884814925545 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789215837297 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158321627917 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728782360941 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.