Topic: Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Currently, there are more and more viewpoints claiming that the government should invest a huge amount of money in constructing novel buildings as a substitution for preserving old buildings. From my point of view, I wholeheartedly disagree with this notion due to portable reasons which will be shed light on in the following paragraphs.
One major ground behind the reason why people should take care of old buildings is that these buildings are presented for a thriving civilization. In fact, each historical period will have unique and charming features that not only reflect a traditional culture but also are firm evidence for the next generation to inherit and develop. Unless there is magnificent architecture, humans would hardly get a well-rounded perception of tremendous knowledge as well as inherit precious spirit heritage, which modern buildings cannot fully provide. Vietnam, for example, thanks to the Dong Son drum, Vietnamese people today acquire historical knowledge as well as inherit these ethnic values for future generations.
Furthermore, each old building will have its own breathtaking beauty that would be a promised tourist destination. In fact, these days, the government not only concentrates on prospecting potential industries but also stimulating the tourism industry through advertising ancient buildings, particularly in France and China. Therefore, more and more foreign travelers choose these countries to visit and capture scenic landscapes, playing a key element in boosting the economy.
In conclusion, although modern high-rise buildings will display stunning beauty, ancient buildings are still playing an important role for humans by providing documents and evidence for the next generation to obtain and are pretty beneficial for thriving the economy. Therefore, the authorities should take responsibility in both protecting the old buildings and constructing state-of-the-art buildings in a balance way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nunu | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
- Topic The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- Topic Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects 89
- Some people say that it is the responsibility of individuals to save money for their own care after they retire To what extent do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78546712803 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13591420909 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612456747405 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.8132001865 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20692160257 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849419951909 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085031386639 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12755862468 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486670308817 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.