International tourists should pay more than the local visitor for cultural and historical attractions? Do you agree or disagree?
In this period of modernity, people think that global travelers should be charged more than inland visitors for racial and ancient allurements. Nowadays, traveling is a great part of nation’s enjoyment all over the world. In my opinion I strongly agree with this notion and my opinion will be discussed in further paragraphs.
Supporting my agreement to the given statement, I firmly
believe that a remarkable portion of GDP come from tourism industry of a state, and it will assist the economic growth of the host country. To cite an example, frequent traveler does not think about how much they spend rather their main emphasis is to travel new places (study of the tourism department of Dhaka university). At the same time government could develop powerful infrastructure like good hotel, local culture etcetera to attract the visitor from this extra payment that will further ensure the better service for the backpacker. In addition to that, it will give the opportunity to contribute to the overall economy of the host territory.
On the other hand, it is unfair to the international excursionist to pay more due to the fact it will make discrimination with local voyager so that it could be demotivated to them. As a result, it may create negative impression for the host country as well as critics get the lucky chance to discuss about it.
In conclusion, cosmopolitan explorer should pay more than local race for cultural and historical attractions. Although there is some adverse impact, I believe that the aforementioned points are strongly supporting my viewpoint.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 78 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 61
- It will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 84
- The graph below shows the population of India and China from the year 2000 to the present day with projections for growth to the year 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The line 73
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14671814672 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89217797349 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7589824307 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23109366392 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081099512874 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115238193243 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114862357354 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850703415688 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14671814672 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89217797349 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633204633205 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7589824307 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23109366392 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081099512874 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115238193243 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114862357354 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850703415688 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.