Some think that people are responsible for their happiness. Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Happiness is currently a subject of significant consideration. Opinions are divergent on whether external factors contribute to how delighted one may feel or whether one should take accountability for one's contentment. Although each viewpoint has its own justifications, from my perspective, the latter statement is more equitable.
On the one hand, granted, extrinsic factors, like monetary issues, play a pivotal role in determining one’s happiness level. Materialistic issues are attributed to the volume of happiness one may experience. Fulfillment cannot be achieved unless people's basic needs for food, shelter, or other necessities, all of which require materialistic exchanges, have been satisfied. Research conducted by Cornell University on the happiness of people from various social backgrounds, for example, has shown that those with higher social status, especially those with substantial annual incomes reported to be more delightful compared to those struggling to meet their basic needs. The rationale for this is that they lead a more well-rounded life with adequate supplies, especially medical and entertainment-purpose ones, assisting them in almost every aspect of life.
However, some, including myself, would contend that each individual takes responsibility for their own fulfillment. People’s inner thoughts determine what is profoundly genuine happiness. The practice of mindfulness can render one more enjoyable in one particular circumstance, altering optimistic attitudes and being a means to seek satisfaction. By embracing this approach, people are inclined to alleviate thoughtless or spontaneous thinking after which reach a state of tranquility and meditation. This can be evidenced that monks, who are practitioners of meditation, try to abolish negative thoughts and seek fulfillment even when the situation in which they are is filled with pessimism.
In conclusion, admittedly, both perspectives of the discussion are justifiable; however, I maintain that each person should be accountable for their contentment considering that they take full control of their mindset. Moreover, shifting their perception of fulfillment might help one’s life become more enjoyable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 93 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | anh801 | 67 | view |
- Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas 89
- Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ther one should take accountability for ones contentment. Although each viewpoint ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tion. This can be evidenced that monks, who are practitioners of meditation, try to abo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9905362776 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35521548741 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649842271293 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9112677215 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249008027227 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072358030549 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486696673775 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13810218422 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320913912447 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ther one should take accountability for ones contentment. Although each viewpoint ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tion. This can be evidenced that monks, who are practitioners of meditation, try to abo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9905362776 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35521548741 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649842271293 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9112677215 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.6 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249008027227 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072358030549 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486696673775 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13810218422 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320913912447 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.