Online education is becoming more and more popular. Some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face – to – face education. Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
During the computer age, advanced technologies have taken their lead in various aspects of life, especially education, strikingly making online education a common choice. Therefore, there is a discourse over whether traditional classes will be replaced with online ones. Although each viewpoint has its own justification, there is a remote chance of conventional teaching methods disappearing in the future.
On the one hand, advocates of holding online classes would contend that the merits of this teaching method outweigh the traditional one. Little restraints on geological borders is one of the benefits. Since the Internet provides effortless platforms for educational purposes, learners from all corners of the world can access courses through some provided websites which are designated by their institutions. Thereby, they have no need to attend face-to-face classes. Another merit is the convenience when it comes to dispensing homework or assignments to students. Teachers now can easily hand out or assign a specific individual some homework tasks. Google Classroom is an ample evidence for this situation, which has become a productive and time-efficient way for teachers to organize their classes’ materials during the pandemic outbreak.
On the other hand, opponents would argue e-learning is not unfailingly an effective approach for students’ developments. One main reason is that face-to-face education makes a considerable contribution to students’ interpersonal skills. Communication skills can be fostered through conversation with classmates, which effectively assists learners in dealing with personal conflicts. If learners only communicate with others through a computer screen, there will be little possibility that they can recognize how their partners actually feel without the ability to observe their etiquette. Not only do students foster their skills in physical classes, but some students would find it easier to obtain new knowledge. With the timely assistance from teachers, students would understand lessons at ease; moreover, they do not hesitate to voice their concerns in a particular part of a lesson.
In conclusion, although modern education has played a vital role in some aspects of learning, the conventional way of teaching cannot be replicated since it has its own justifications. However, I believe online education can by no means replace the traditional teaching method given the merits of the latter one itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | dindin_8 | 58 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | huynhthithuyduong | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | amnuverma | 81 | view |
| 2021-05-07 | amnuverma | 73 | view |
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 89
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- An increasing number of people are choosing to have cosmetic surgery in order to improve their appearance Why is this the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74114441417 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10843654817 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604904632153 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3684071785 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.055555556 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164769937418 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527170627637 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052853339975 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108605490774 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243632835818 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.