People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of every aspect of the world, there have been various changes in life quality of people in the 21st century. Despite the higher living costs, from my perspective, people in the 21st century have more accessibility to enhanced education and healthcare.
Compared to those in previous years, people nowadays have better healthcare opportunities. Granted that human's health is being aggravated by exhaust fumes from factories, illustrated by the increasing number of people suffering from chronic diseases such as cancers, advocates for this viewpoint contend that the quantity and efficacy of healthcare equipment have been improved. For the fact that technology has taken the lead in the 21st century, many companies pay more attention to develop and enhance the mechanism of many devices. More specifically, more and more investments have been made in medical devices to assist a striking number of patients in rehabilitation. This can be evidenced by the latest innovation of a company called MedBot. They have taken the initiative in developing robots that could support patients for their post surgery rehabilitation by creating a personalized exercise and giving instructions with some ongoing notice advice. These devices have been mass produced and are reported to have help over a thousand people in their recovery.
Another better quality of life that people in this century can have exposure to is education. While in the past there was a thin chance for people to accomplish their educational ideal, especially for those in the outskirts where there was hardly a school accessible for them. Moreover, institution fees, at that time, were prohibitive and thereby schools were only a place for the wealthy. Education, nowadays, has taken another step allowing learners to study without any less financial and geological restrictions. For a century of advanced technological developments, many classes are currently available on the Internet. Not only can students take a course in any preferable time, but also there is a minimal amount of money required to be valid for the class. Take Coursera for example. Although it is an online platform for education purposes, it has gained its popularity through many courses from a countless number of countries and universities. Learners can obtain new knowledge without any cost; however, to earn a certificate they have to spend a relative grant of money. Such a platform provides students with wider access to many courses of their interests.
In conclusion, people in the 21st century have allegedly been believed to lead a life of greater quality compared with those in the past. I completely agree with this statement in light of the higher qualified education and medical support given in this century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-22 | Quyen Bui | 89 | view |
- Some people believe world poverty can be solved by the governments of rich countries giving large amounts of money to the governments of poor countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows local catches and imports of fresh fish into Perth Australia for the years 2004 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 78
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... healthcare opportunities. Granted that humans health is being aggravated by exhaust f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89063265007 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53514739229 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5588737301 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215673240177 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729261260147 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957539511622 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169756981469 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746274210769 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... healthcare opportunities. Granted that humans health is being aggravated by exhaust f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89063265007 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53514739229 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5588737301 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215673240177 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729261260147 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957539511622 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169756981469 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746274210769 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.