the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of people who are less productive of agricultural lands in four different groups, and the table shows the effects of it in three regions of the world during the 1990s.
In general, the most important cause related to over-grazing 35 percent in Europe affected more than other regions 7.7 percent during the 1990s.
As can be seen, there are three main causes that agricultural lands become less productive such as over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation ordered by 35,30, and 28 percent, and another group exists too which is no longer significant. Europe was affected more than others in the mentioned causes. Deforestation has 9.8 percent amount of 23 percent and remained related to over-cultivation and over-grazing by 7.7 and 5.5 percent. After Europe, Oceania is located in second place with a total of 13 percent over-grazing affected of 11.3 percent and finally North America by 5 percent located at third place that over-cultivation in this region has most affected agriculture during the 1990s.
In total, during the 1990s Europe was affected more than other regions by 23 percent.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989
- The first chart be ow shows energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 73
- The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, third, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26229508197 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08562740451 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3490986457 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226627283105 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122895613023 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109878524377 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176785155522 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107831499259 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.