Some people believe that the construction of new public buildings such as museums, town halls and sports facilities is more important than renovation of the existing ones, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People hold differing views about whether it is of greater importance to reconstruct or refurbish the public sites. While some individuals argue that renovating such buildings has more advantages than constructing new ones, I firmly believe that it is more advisable to build brand-new public facilities.
On the first hand, part of the population contends that refurbishing the public constructions instead of rebuilding them is more appealing for various reasons, chief of which is due to the lack of vacant land in metropolitan regions. As a matter of fact, if the local authority gives permission to a project of building a stadium, they might take into account of displacing the community in order that there are sufficient vacant plots of land for construction work. However, this displacement can make thousands of people move out their original place of residence. Additionally, they have no choices but to relocate in an overcrowded area simply because of the shrinking sources of land. Consequently, this trend would worsen the overpopulation issue in urban area, which is the top of agenda in most cities. In contrast, if the state decides to renew the existing urban structures such as repainting the outside or installing new equipment, the urban planners would not have to displace city dwellers for a plot of land.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the local authority had better build new building from the scratch, there are several justifications for this argument and the most convincing is that the public buildings should be laid on safety grounds. In fact, any building experience a deterioration in quality, the public constructions may fall into disrepair with the passage of time, so they can be collapsed suddenly. In case this situation is perpetuated without timely approach from the state, the lives of not only visitors but also passers-by would be put at risk of accidents. Meanwhile, the new-built building designs should meet strict safety standard before being approved by the urban planners. Hence, the prevention of unexpected incidents with those visiting the public sites or living around them can be guaranteed.
To sum up, it is undeniable that there are two schools of thought about the building methods of the public construction. Although refurbishment of public properties might be more convenient as city dwellers are not forced to leave their original places, the projects of building public sites, especially ones witnessing quality deterioration, should be given higher priority for safety reasons.
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to meet this demand 67
- Many people nowadays spend a large part of their free time using a smartphone What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26650366748 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96270983791 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579462102689 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8410442437 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237634447052 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744606959308 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837393370765 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166208552676 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116590247334 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.