Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent times, with the breakthrough of technology, the young generations have increasingly had access to smartphones and utilized it for a noticeable time each day. While this phenomenon is attributed to a wide range of justifications, I firmly believe that the trend toward overusing phones among children could pose some detrimental effects on lives of the youth.
On the first hand, the widespread popularity of smartphones among children is held accountable to several reasons. One of the major causes is the video games available on phones that are addictive to youngsters. In fact, by the curiosity, many children desire to discover the features of those convenient devices. Therefore, they might come across some attractive games on App store or Google play, and invite their classmates or friends to experience games together in search for happiness and relaxation. For instance, a huge proportion of Vietnamese students are accustomed to playing 'Lords mobile' game as their daily routine. That is simply because the game has acquired widespread popularity among children across the globe since 2017 due to it's exciting ways to play. In addition, they can have their classmates as their partners to refresh after a busy school day. In other words, Lord mobile and some similar games are the indispensable part of many learners' school years.
On the other hand, this development might impact deleteriously not only on children's health but also their scholastic performances. Firstly, allocating a considerable amount of time exposing to small screens of smartphones in lieu of doing exercises regularly could put children's health at risk. In particular, looking at the mobile phones' screen for such a long time would lead to a wide range of visual problems, hence a dramatic rise in the number of children who wear glasses at a young age nowadays. Secondly, students are willingly to play those addictive games with their friends even during lessons. Consequently, they might miss some crucial information about certain modules, which results in worse academic results at school as well as the lower quality of the curriculum. As a result, children will face up to some hardship to achieve their scholastic targets.
In conclusion, the increased number of children spending hours on their smartphones is mainly attributable to the attractive video games and apps. And I strongly hold the view that this trend could influence negatively to children's lives, namely health deterioration and worsened academic performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- There is too much noise in many public places in cities What are the causes of this problem What can be done to solve the problem 73
- THE GRAPH BELOW SHOWS THE SALES OF CHILDREN S BOOKS ADULT FICTION AND EDUCATIONAL BOOKS BETWEEN 2002 AND 2006 IN ONE COUNTRY 67
- In many situations people who break the law should be warned instead of punished To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Other think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94631549567 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4403228856 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18136172675 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571452889017 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357347259359 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118107548132 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237664135773 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.