A glance at the provided bar chart illustrates the information about the three different sectors that contributed to gross domestic product (GDP) of India during four decades from 1960 to 2000. In general, it is clearly apparent that services had an upward trend in benefaction while agriculture showed the opposite.
Looking in more detail from the graph, in 1960, agriculture was the dominant sector that impact the India's GDP at around 63% while the other two fields only beneficial not more that 20%. However, in the next two decades, although it still the highest influenced sector compared to others, the contribution of agriculture stated to decline decade by decade by 10%. On the other hand, the impact of services and industry climbed gradually reached the range of 20%-30%. Interestingly, in 1990 and 2000, services became the most affected field that posed 45% and 63% of the total GDP respectively. Meanwhile, agriculture declined significantly at 15% in the end of the period. Finally, industry sector had unchanged contribution at 25% until 2000.
- The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 80
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays all new town planning should include public parks shopping malls and sports facilities Do you agree or disagree 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'decade by'.
Suggestion: decade by
...bution of agriculture stated to decline decade by decade by 10%. On the other hand, the impact of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...changed contribution at 25% until 2000.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, still, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21637426901 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84556860673 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8969305744 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208086318068 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083344393051 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109494903855 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199958899286 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971994403488 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'decade by'.
Suggestion: decade by
...bution of agriculture stated to decline decade by decade by 10%. On the other hand, the impact of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...changed contribution at 25% until 2000.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, still, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21637426901 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84556860673 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8969305744 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208086318068 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083344393051 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109494903855 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199958899286 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971994403488 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.