The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the people who use the restaurants in five distinct groups in the United States from 2003 to 2013.
It is obvious that, two groups includes once a week and once or twice a month has highest percentage among all groups and the peak is related to once or twice a month in 2013, while two groups no longer significant because people who go to restaurant every day and never are little.
As can be seen, although people who go to restaurant several times a week is under 20% in 2006 and about 16 percent in 2003 and 2013 and it is under 15 percent in each three 2003, 2006, and 2013 in a few times a year. The American residents have liked eat their meals in there once a week and once or twice a month which in first the in 2006 reached the peak by approximately 35% and in second the peak related to 2013 as same percent, the two remain groups are no longer significant.
As a result, people have tendency to go restaurant once a week or once or twice a month in the United States and less go several times a week or a few times a year.
- the diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the highest'.
Suggestion: has the highest
...s once a week and once or twice a month has highest percentage among all groups and the pea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.18660287081 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33795591606 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8102180255 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.8 22.9334400587 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104095640993 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729584141666 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496415202242 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080585683359 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445390010984 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.91 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the highest'.
Suggestion: has the highest
...s once a week and once or twice a month has highest percentage among all groups and the pea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.18660287081 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33795591606 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8102180255 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.8 22.9334400587 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104095640993 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729584141666 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496415202242 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080585683359 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445390010984 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.91 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.