Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often believed that technological advancements have engendered more problems for modern life than what it tackles. While acknowledging the reasons for this thinking, I would argue that technologies are beneficial.
Granted, advocates of deeming technology problematic may argue that the proliferation of technologies come at the expense of the rise in unemployment rates. This is because numerous jobs, which used to be performed by humans, are now replaced by artificial intelligence such as manufacturing, driving, assembly, or packaging. However, it is important to note that robots are often used for repetitive tasks and can hardly replicate jobs that require human qualities such as doctor, teacher, flight attendant. Robots, for example, cannot work as a therapist, whose work requires empathy, understanding between people and people. After all, these so-called replacements actually bolster working productivity in light of the superiority of robots and many jobs still demand human presence.
The argument in favor of technologies serving as solutions to numerous issues is further strengthened by its unparalleled conveniences. The bombardment of many state-of-the-art technological inventions has revolutionized many aspects of our lives. For example, without the help of communication applications, people would not be able to keep in contact with their loved ones through such long distances. By the sample token, online shopping has gained traction among citizens, rendering it the preferred shopping method by many. In the past, people had to travel to supermarkets or malls to purchase goods. However, they can now order almost everything they wish with just a click of a button and internet access. This revolution has made the purchasing process even easier than ever before. Finally, distance working or learning are other pronounced benefits of technology. allowing people to eliminate the need for daily mute and offer numerous online courses and study materials without having to travel long distances.
In conclusion, while there are justifications for advocating technologies being harmful than helpful, I would contend that technological advancements have wielded substantial influence on people’s daily lives, considering its conveniences in terms of communication, shopping, working or learning irrespective of geographical barriers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
- In the past important knowledge about history and culture was stored in museums However today people can see everything on the internet without paying any money Therefore we no longer need museums To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statemen 84
- New technologies present children with new possibilities and potential danger Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of technology on children in todays society 89
- Some people say that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games Others say that young people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 875, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Allowing
...ther pronounced benefits of technology. allowing people to eliminate the need for daily ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, then, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84438040346 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28691501965 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634005763689 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.406818107 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.294117647 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186758566107 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563886176736 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778959841489 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138735349605 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917224396554 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.