The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this?
In contemporary days, it is undeniable that mass production of products has posed a number of threats to the environment. The precedents of this diverse, which will be examined in this essay.
The first and foremost reason for the increase in the number of items is considered the lack of sex education. To be more specific, there are now some countries where no population control methods are taught and spread so as for family planning to be operated, for example, India. It was recorded that in several Indian ethnic groups, a majority of girls who are under teenage age got pregnant due to sexual assaults. This not only comes as the cost of the population explosion but also the rise in consuming demands, increasing necessity productions, namely food, drinks, or clothing items. Once mass production takes place, chances are it significantly does harm to the environment harm to the environment, leaving behind a myriad of consequences such as resource depletion or pollution.
In addition, it is also worth noticing that manufacturing more merchandise is attributed to fast fashion, the trend in which clothing items are produced rapidly at a low cost so that buyers can keep pace with current fashion trends. After the trend cycle had changed in America or China in 2020, the newspaper published the statistics of up to two tonnes of crop top T-shirts, indicating that fast fashion has fostered “throwaway fashion”. Consequently, wasted pieces of clothing accummulated rapidly and formed landfills, which would lead to ground pollution or even air pollution if they are incinerated.
In conclusion, there are ample causes for the increase in the need for retail goods, some of the ones worth taking into account are not investing in proper sex education and impulse buying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-26 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the Happy Valley Shopping Center in 1982 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Today TV channels show more men s sports than women s sports Why is this the case Should TV channels give equal time to women s sports and men s sports 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... increase in the need for retail goods, some of the ones worth taking into account are not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14726027397 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89644852452 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7710796851 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.636363636 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126664933859 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463581903036 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461415677139 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799613256009 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538608610431 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.