The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
A glance at the linegraph provided reveals the energy consumption by fuels in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The initial impression from the graph is that fossil fuels are the main energy used by population in the United States and are set to be consumed more and more until 2030. In contrast, in spite of witnessing a slight rise in the number of clean energy users, these non-renewable energy resources attracted fewer and fewer people in America.
With a reference to fossil fuels, in 1980, Petrol consumption stayed well beyond the others at about 35 quadrillion units, following that was the usage of natural gas at about 20 quadrillion units and the data of coal was underneath at just about 16 quadrillion units. Over the next 20 years, these fossil fuels consumption witnessed a slight fluctuation before a considerable rise during another 20 years and is expected to surge to the end of the period shown. In 2023, Petrol and oil will be still the most preferable energy used by the American at nearly 50 quadrillion units , standing right after that will be coal and natural gas at around 30 quadrillion units and over 20 quadrillion units respectively.
In concern of alternative sources of energy, starting at nearly the same amount at under quadrillion units each, the amount of these green energy experienced a minimal increase for the first 40 years, From 2025 to 2030, while nuclear power and solar/ wind energy consumption is anticipated to continue its upward trends to over 5 quadrillion units, the amount of hydropower used in the USA is hoped to remain stable and be equal to that of the first year at under 5 quadrillion units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... American at nearly 50 quadrillion units , standing right after that will be coal ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, still, well, while, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86315789474 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72424073887 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.639329465 43.030603864 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.0 112.824112599 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.7142857143 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177156181451 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102535268177 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863093698691 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145806272433 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843355421459 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.8 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.8 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.