The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001, government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991
The given diagrams demonstrate the number of undergraduates in the UK, the amount of state expenditure on each learner and the rate of students by household financial condition in the two decades, which is from 1991 to 2001.
Overall, in the first year, a wide range of colleges came from the families who had the moderate earnings. Besides that, more and more individuals started to studylearn in universities while the authorities declined the expense for people who pursued the higher academic paths.
Concerning the two charts with trends, in the first year of the examined period, the number of university’s students was more than ten million, which saw a dramatic growth to just north of fifteen million after four years before still considerably climbing to twenty one million in the second year of the 21st century. Meanwhile, the allowance that the state spent to assist the students with difficult circumstances started at 6500 pounds in the first year of the 1990s. After that, this number significantly decreased to just south of 5000 pounds after half of a decade and then still remained unchanged.
Turning to the remaining pie chart, the learners came from three distinctive types of family economic backgrounds, in which the percentage of the middle one being highest, accounted for 62%, which was double that of well-of household, at 30%. Nevertheless, only 8% made up the low earnings family, which is the lowest of that given pie chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | buiminhduc | 82 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | minhquanvn | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that governments should spend money on providing faster means of public transport Other people think there are more priorities for public transport e g costs environment safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 73
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...s before still considerably climbing to twenty one million in the second year of the 21st ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earnings'' or 'earning's'?
Suggestion: earnings'; earning's
.... Nevertheless, only 8% made up the low earnings family, which is the lowest of that giv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78542523684 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0729159033 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.375 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232139510335 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915810712127 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703887611096 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13852502118 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644293299994 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.