Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a saying 'work is the essence of humankind,' and educators should provide opportunities for students to learn how to face problems. Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs, such as working for a charity, improving the neighborhood, or teaching sports to younger children. While this could be beneficial for students in developing skills and responsibility, it should not be overly burdensome.
On the one hand, education systems could teach pupils in their first years of age how to confront different problems in their lives and improve their technical skills, abilities, and communication skills. For instance, when a student works for a technical mechanic community, the student learns many things after three or four months from his/her boss. This makes the teenager a positive point because learn a skill that help in their future life. Hence, community services should attract high school students to teach them and promote their abilities. Working students in such communities gives them negative eyesight in the future life because they think will be faced with lots of problems which are so hard.
On the other hand, by students learn to have a sense of responsibility when they accept a responsibility. This issue is so important for them in their marriage life. Although unpaid community services do not give money to any student, they teach the life lesson to them. In addition, these services can help to government to grow a useful person for the future. Therefore, these communities have a lot of benefits for both students and the government without any cost. They have a long-term insight into being high school students.
In conclusion, it is a wonderful issue that the government set a rule for education systems to join their high school children to unpaid community services in the summer after they finish their terms. Not only does this don’t hurt their lessons but also, can give them to fill their free time in the summer.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart be ow shows energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09638554217 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71999792935 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6178215515 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303968442888 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1146152046 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135625148196 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214931204948 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137151151327 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.