The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tables illustrate the number of two bnanans and coffee sell in five distinct European countries in 1999 and 2004.
It is obvious that all countries sales have increased in sale of coffee from 1999 to 2004, it is ture for bananas except Denmark and Sweden conturies that decreasaed. In addition the lowest number related to beliugm thoroughly in these years.
As can be seen, the United Kingdom increased significantly more than 18 million of euros form 1.5 in 2004, the Switzerland has double in number of sale and other three reamning groups did not change substantialy in selling coffee. In constrant, Sweden and Denmark declined in sale by ordered 0.8 and 1.1 form 1.8 and 2. Although the united kingdom and Belgium have raised by about 4.5 and 3.4 millions of euros the Switzerland sugar sharply near to a half million of euros to 47 in sale of bananas in 2004.
As a result, people have more tendency to buy coffee in these five countries and all of their rate increased in 2004. Bananas by 2004 was good in Switzerland.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-04 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '4 million'
Suggestion: 4 million
... Belgium have raised by about 4.5 and 3.4 millions of euros the Switzerland sugar sharply ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 1615.20841683 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 181.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7182320442 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53567687499 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 176.041082164 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 506.74238477 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7408237515 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182934656872 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855299932452 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717331369341 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136457873058 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613215844487 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.