The tables below provide information about the consumption and production of potatoes in five parts of the world in 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tables illustrate the potato use and manufacture in five regions on the globe during the year 2006.
Overall, Europe was the area which consumed the largest quantity of potatoes. It is also noticeable that the production level of this continent was in the second rank.
Regarding the first table, which indicates the potato consumption, Europe stood in the first place, with over 95 kg per person. This region was followed by North America with about a half of its figure. The continents of Asia and South and Central America were in the third and fourth ranks respectively, with around one-fourth as compared to that of Europe. Africa was on the last level, with about 14 kg per person.
Concerning the second table, which demonstrates the potato production, Asia was at the top of the list, with over 131 million tons. Europe was ranked second, with around 5 tons less than Europe. North America was in the third position, with below 25 million tons. The continents of Africa and South and Central America came fourth and last respectively, with around 15 million tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- A lot of people spend a major part of their adult life at work so job satisfaction is very important for individual happiness What are the main factors that contribute to job satisfaction What are the solutions for people who are unsatisfied with their jo 73
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference center in 2010 and 2025 as proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, second, so, third, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91847826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48867353885 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0203878572 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.06110463543 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292724091289 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369380054115 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545440026115 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474556588767 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.