The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustrated floor plans provide outline on how sports center of a University appears now and how its floor plan is modified in the future.

Overall, it can be observed that sports center will go through significant change with addition of numerous sports facilities especially in the areas excluding the main block in the center.
In present, main block of sports centre is located in the centre, and outdoor courts are located on its east and west. The sports centre can be accessed from the southern side of the main block. Reception is located right in front of the access point and there is changing room on its left whereas seating area on its right. Likewise, 25 meter swimming pool is located right in the middle of the block and gym is on its northern side.

In future, the entrance and main block will be almost same where space in front of reception is extended on its both sides, and the gym is extended towards its east making it double than its previous space. More space is allocated to build café and sports shop respectively both on east and west of reception. Similarly, changing room will be constructed on the right and left corners. Outdoor courts will be replaced by leisure pool on the western side which can be accessed by passing through sports shop and changing room. Sports hall can be accessed by passing through café on its first left. Moving forward to the northern side there is door way to gym and on the way to gym towards its right dance studio will be constructed.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-15 Saul 67 view
2023-08-11 trikhung777 78 view
Essays by user Saul :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67790262172 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35321663392 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7591162264 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137480260625 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605121604801 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512509432341 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106633235139 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046832455747 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.