The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the current area in the town of Norbition and its development plan for the future.
It is obvious that the main square will not change in the new design but will add some new pathways to this place. All of the factories were replaced with housing and the middle of the town got crowded in the future plan. It is so good but should allocate much money for development.
As can be seen, there is not any change in the border of the city and its wide does not change. In the developed plan there is no factory and all of them are omitted but a school, playground, medical center, and shops are added in the new version of the town which facilities are near the middle square. Although the middle center doesn’t change three new paths add that end to this place and one of them passes the river in the farmland which is located a housing there and another way leads to the school. The last way is to link to a small squire that is added below the origin squire in the planned future development. Six housing areas were constructed around the town. There are new facilities that the farmland section can use and construct a path that link the town and farmland to each other.
In conclusion, the new plan of the town has more facilities and pathways that seems it is better than before scheme.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ll add some new pathways to this place. All of the factories were replaced with housing an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40740740741 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27656463395 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502057613169 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9592754812 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3636363636 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145717130412 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619553303704 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569696725515 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107442182615 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519720374672 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.