The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which e result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the percentage of energy consumed in Australian family averagely and the proportion of greenhouse gas emitted by Australian household from the energy.
It is noticeable that heating was the biggest consumer of Australian household energy, and that water heating produced most amount of greenhouse gas.
As shown in the first pie chart, heating was the highest percentage of energy consumption, constituting 42%, and 30% energy was utilized in water heating which was the second largest. By contrast, the least amount of energy resource was consumed by cooling, with only 2%. As for the remainder, refrigeration and lighting used collectively almost the same amount of energy as other appliances, at 11% and 15%, respectively.
As can be seen from the second pie chart, water heating was the biggest producer of greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 32%, which was slightly more than the percentage of gas generated by other appliances (at 28%), while cooling was still the smallest producer whose outcome only comprised 3%. Similar amount of greenhouse gas was emitted by heating and refrigeration, at 15% and 14% respectively, and lighting utilized approximately half of their amout.
- Some people think that competition at work at school and in daily life is a good thing Others believe that we should try to cooperate more rather than competing against each other Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 54
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 79
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42408376963 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98694655627 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8287032539 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208280939976 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110861033126 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680673378555 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152304103077 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680803981963 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.