The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph elucidates the proportion of cinema goers in an unknown European country during a week over the span of 3 years commencing from 2003.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that while the figure for people going to cinemas on Friday reaches a plateau, that on the other experience fluctuating patterns over the given timeframe. Another striking feature is that the percentage of people visiting on Saturday generally exceed that on the other six days.
When it comes to the first four days of the week on which the proportion of cinema goers in three years generally lies below 20%, that on Tuesday comes top of the list, with the apex of 20% in the year 2003. As that on Monday and Thursday experience upward trends to 13% and approximately 20% respectively, that on Tuesday and Wednesday undergo mere and staggering declines by 4% and 10%, in turn.
Turning to the three remainders, it is evident that the largest percentage of people go to cinemas on Saturday, towering at the zenith of 45%. Whereas Saturday and Sunday hover around 42% and 32% in the figure for cinema goers, that on Friday stagnates at 30%.
- Some people believe that one of the best ways to solve environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There are some advantages and disadvantages of the cinema Do you agree with this statement 56
- Your friend is thinking about learning to drive and would like some advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter say why a driving licence is advantageous recommend a driving school give any extra guidance tips 73
- Writing reading and maths are the three recognized traditional subjects Computer skill should also be the fourth largest branch Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60881023865 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.975562999 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165210058335 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739125783434 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435867358568 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958405615383 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297227872062 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.