The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from
developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The prompt claim that we can usually learn much more from like-minded people whose views contradict our own because disagreement can cause tension, demotivation and impede learning. The given claim is higly contentious because different people may have disparate positions and opinions on the given topic.
Some may go for the topic, while other can't argue with it at all. I bot agree and disagree with the given claim that we can usually learn much more form people whose view we can share than those whose view contradict our own. There are three reasons and examples supporting my position are presented in the follwoing paragraph.
Firstly, all of people are dependent in technology in today's life, which distroy of critical thinking capabilities of a people because they are totally rely in technologies. For example , In past, the students solve the mathematical problem like multiplication, subtraction, addition, and division from own mind but, nowday people solves this problem by using calculator. Aditionally, which reduce the critical thinking capabiities. In effect, luxuries and conveniences stop people capabilities in independent way.
Secondly, technologies make people life more easier in comparision to the past. For instance, techonlogy likes mobile phone helped people to talk about long distance relationship, Also, the different techologies used for solving different problem just googling. Today's if students have some peoblem, they search that peoblem in internet, and they are independent to their teachers. Hence, luxurious life help to people more dependent individuals
in sum/ conclusion, the reasons and examples presented to support the claim/position that both consonant and dissonant with the following topic. The essay highlights the luxurious and conveniencies of the comtemporary life people fromdeveloping into true strong and independent induvisulas. The example of technologies illustrate to support the given topic.
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo 58
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 58
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Some may go for the topic, while other cant argue with it at all. I bot agree and d...
^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... while other cant argue with it at all. I bot agree and disagree with the given c...
^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istroy of critical thinking capabilities of a people because they are totally re...
^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inking capabilities of a people because they are totally rely in technologies. F...
^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
... of a people because they are totally rely in technologies. For example , In past...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otally rely in technologies. For example , In past, the students solve the mathem...
^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tally rely in technologies. For example , In past, the students solve the mathema...
^^
Line 6, column 41, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...Secondly, technologies make people life more easier in comparision to the past. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblem just googling. Todays if students have some peoblem, they search that peob...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...to people more dependent individuals in sum/ conclusion, the reasons and exampl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70989761092 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04585142191 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7866999212 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184015968435 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671973643294 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581917545428 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102338003992 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435075957488 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... Some may go for the topic, while other cant argue with it at all. I bot agree and d...
^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... while other cant argue with it at all. I bot agree and disagree with the given c...
^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istroy of critical thinking capabilities of a people because they are totally re...
^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inking capabilities of a people because they are totally rely in technologies. F...
^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
... of a people because they are totally rely in technologies. For example , In past...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otally rely in technologies. For example , In past, the students solve the mathem...
^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tally rely in technologies. For example , In past, the students solve the mathema...
^^
Line 6, column 41, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...Secondly, technologies make people life more easier in comparision to the past. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblem just googling. Todays if students have some peoblem, they search that peob...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...to people more dependent individuals in sum/ conclusion, the reasons and exampl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70989761092 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04585142191 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7866999212 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184015968435 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671973643294 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581917545428 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102338003992 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435075957488 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.