Negative attitudes about school
It is widely acknowledged that there is a surging number of many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. This trend has been a polarizing topic that many people lean toward. There are some causes for this issue and several possible solutions could be addressed to.
On the one hand, there are many compelling rationales why school-leavers are usually upset about learning. First and foremost, tuition fees are supposed to be higher than standards in schools and universities throughout some countries. Consequently, underprivileged students who live under adverse conditions cannot afford to enroll in or continue to learn. Given the fact that in several nations in Europe, the complaints from citizen about the cost of schooling has arisen recently, and it may continue even drastically in the near future. Additionally, studies have shown that students who often leave school are not as talented as others. The schooling environment is highly competitive, so that incompetent students might not catch up with others because of the lack of productivity and efficiency. For instance, surveys have been conducted in many universities in Asia and America, and the clearest reason of school-leavers is that they face severely peer pressure, which discourage them to abandon their learning.
However, despite the aforementioned causes, government in coordination with universities are preparing lots of solutions to deal with this problem, specifically in developed and developing nations. The key solution is the implication of policy about tuition exemption for disadvantageous students. Waiving tuition can encourage indirectly students to return to their schools and so that the total enrolment of schooling will reach a notable upswing. As a matter of fact, in several Asian countries, the tuition fees are being discussed to be lower, which allows students and pupils at any age to have better opportunities to gain access to lifelong learning and prevents them from leaving school. Another pronounced solution is that government should hold some campaigns and propaganda to address the imperative role of learning in human lives. Having experience and reinforcing the knowledge from learning is beneficial not only for academic skills but also daily life skills. Therefore, schooling ought to be widespread instead of being criticized badly by a little school-leavers, who spoils the importance of learning in modern society.
In conclusion, even though this trend will be constantly controversial due to its disputed causes and effects, I do think that it may be quickly solved with a lot of practical solutions implied by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | TranthikimNgoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | tranthihuynhnhu | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | tranthihuynhnhu | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | tranthihuynhnhu | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | tranthihuynhnhu | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...due to its disputed causes and effects, I do think that it may be quickly solved ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47584541063 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07267739208 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1607770174 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.944444444 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238046368937 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689711227405 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072170475215 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117764845988 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719618340864 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.