The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016.
The given picture depicts the proportion of businesses in the UK including small, medium and large businesses who had a social media presence in the period of 4 years from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, the figure for all types of businesses grew annually except in 2015 when there was a significant decline in the number of businesses possessing social presence. Notably, large businesses increased minimally yet had the greatest presence each year.
In terms of small businesses, less than 30% had a social media presence in 2012. This figure rose to approximately 35% in 2014, after which it decreased to 30% in 2015 before recovering to roughly 50% at the end of the period. Similarly, medium businesses witnessed an identical trend, beginning at 31%, rising dramatically to under 50% in 2013 and 2014, falling to 30% in 2015 and surging again to 52% in 2016.
Turning to large businesses, the beginning of large businesses’ figure was double the small and medium enterprises (78%). The proportion stay unchanged until 2015 when it plunged to around 51% and finally rose back to 79% in 2016.
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991 73
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'stays'.
Suggestion: stays
... medium enterprises 78%. The proportion stay unchanged until 2015 when it plunged to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98907103825 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78482726972 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5403275151 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293054659558 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134985610601 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141837298597 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201257461259 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151424664422 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.