Some students to take a gap year after graduating high school to work and/or travel. The advantages and disadvantages of this?
Nowadays, there are some students want to take a cavity academic year after completely high school courses to work or travel. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of students take a gap year to work and travel. First, given subsidies for high school are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescents and take a gap year to work hard r travel are also below to relaxing and release energy. This gap year support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall work in free time rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of bored and tired, which eventually promotes a comfortable society. Second, take a gap year to work and travel probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that rest and cultivate human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than minor benefits once take a gap year after graduated high school. First, all students take a gap year academic would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from school tuition and fees, universities could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, high school students take a gap year to work or travel would tempt many young people following including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in college pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for university admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable education paths. It, instead, would be a more gap year viable option if the resources were focused on less privileged yet gifted students.
In conclusion, in this modern life, have some people take a gap year for travel or work and had some advantages but it disadvantages more than.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-08 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Some people think that should bailiwick the science of food and how to compose it Others think th 61
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart show the price production in four countries from 2005 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features relevant 67
- Some employers believe that job applicants social skills are more important than their academic qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar charts show information about passable house expenses in England London and to hand over the equivalence in respect to the passable house cost between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21937321937 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80244001165 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584045584046 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5704299178 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.923076923 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54791820683 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204494012703 0.084324248473 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15027800539 0.0667982634062 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.36305664945 0.151304729494 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559413624129 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.