Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Having visited Canada, where the household waste recycling is at a high rate, I realised that the level of litter recycling in Kazakhstan, where I am from, is substantially less that of in Canada. This significant difference between the two countries in terms of waste recycling is due to governments' policy: the Canadian government requires its citizens to recycle household wastes, whereas in Kazakhstan, waste recycling is not under the governmental control, it is conducted by private companies. Thus, in my opinion, it is vital that waste recycling is encouraged by laws.
These days, waste recycling should be under the government supervision due to the fact that household litters can be found in far wilderness areas, which threatens both animals and the environment. Wastes, especially in the form of plastic bags, for instance, claim thousands of marine predators' lives annually since plastic bags resemble to jellyfishes, which are one of the main sources of food for the predators. Legally requiring people to recycle their wastes, therefore, can decrease the rate of animal mortality due to wastes and the environmental contamination.
Moreover, if the government enforces individuals to recycle the household wastes, it will save its natural resources, which is becoming more scarce every year. Plastic bags as well as aluminium cans, for example, can be recycled several times, which, in turn, decreases oil drilling and aluminium mining production since those goods will be reproduced from wastes. In addition, this process approach will not deteriorate economy of a country (decreased natural resource extracting) as the number of recycling factories will increase.
In conclusion, a legal enforcement of the government in the household waste recycling is vital since it will increase the rate of recycling, which, in turn, reduces the amount of harm on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010. 67
- Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. what are your opinions on this? 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both views and give your op 70
- Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes? 61
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Having visited Canada, where the househo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...waste recycling is encouraged by laws. These days, waste recycling should be un...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the environmental contamination. Moreover, if the government enforces ind...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of recycling factories will increase. In conclusion, a legal enforcement of th...
^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the amount of harm on the environment.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as well as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.30029154519 0.247107183377 122% => OK
Verbs: 0.128279883382 0.155533422707 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0612244897959 0.0946595960268 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0379008746356 0.0501214627716 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291545189504 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137026239067 0.122226691241 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0349854227405 0.0403226058552 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.10520373719 2.80594681477 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0204081632653 0.0326793684256 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0874635568513 0.0861772015684 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0262390670554 0.021408717616 123% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0204081632653 0.011925033212 171% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1919.0 1933.35771543 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 316.048096192 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.52721088435 6.12580529183 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414965986395 0.374742101984 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.363945578231 0.28420135186 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.265306122449 0.203846283523 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.207482993197 0.137316102897 151% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10520373719 2.80594681477 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 59.3106371844 60.7387585426 98% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0891783567 62% => OK
Sentence length: 29.4 20.7743622355 142% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0843115318 49.517814964 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.9 127.492653851 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 20.7743622355 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 0.814263465372 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 65.7945578231 49.1944974215 134% => OK
Elegance: 2.41791044776 1.69124875643 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389786742353 0.332605444948 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.158897621073 0.102741220458 155% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0770700211103 0.0668466124924 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.665393311459 0.534860350844 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142746384086 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189606407136 0.134430193775 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712645617341 0.0742795772207 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.330385534938 0.324371583561 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0125682648265 0.0638462369009 20% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262484481214 0.228012699653 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675729729523 0.058150111329 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.68436873747 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9