“Nation’s should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of
their citizens are hungry or unemployed.”
The statement contends that, if the crude and rudimentary requirements of the nation’s citizen are not fulfilled, the citizens are hungry and unemployed, then the funds which the government pays for arts should be suspended. I agree with the statement because if the citizens are hungry and unemployed, they would not be able to focus on the future. They will just be thinking about the means for satisfying their hunger and then about the future.
Even though art is a passion for life for many one’s, passion needs enthusiasm which comes when you are satisfied and have the ability to work for it. That requires a lots of strength and need to work hard for it. We need something to be consumed likely a day according to the need to be fresh and fervor. You can take an example of one’s own self starting a day without breakfast. It would be fatigue and we will feel enervated resulting to non-consistent and effective work. Hence, it is necessary to satisfy hunger.
Unemployment is the root cause of the decrease in the company’s gross income. Due to the decrease in the profits earned by the corporates, recession takes place resulting into unemployment. Unemployment will lead to the decrease in the family’s income turning to scarcity of food. In this case it is totally feasible to abort the funds which are proposed to art by the government and use those funds sparingly for the good of the unemployed and the needy one’s. Due to the above reason too the statement is acceptable.
With the inconsistencies in the job’s and their lifestyle, people tend to commit crimes and many illegal things that are against the law. It is better for the state government to pay that money to those who are needy and provide a source of earning so that can survive in the competition of life and think for their county and life. Art is not as essential as one’s subsistence. If they survive then and then only they would be able to think about their future with art or any field of their interest.
Aborting the funds for art would lower the interest of the people in it and would deny for choosing the once. Its importance would also decrease gradually. Funds provides to some colleges or institutes running art as a field would be in lack of the money and due to this the necessary tools and equipment required for it would be scanty. This would create a decrease in the interest in particular field is a disadvantage.
Hence, in total we can say that art is essential but more superior is the need for food and employment. The hunger well satisfied would lead to wealthy thoughts and would definitely make up an artful and prosperous nation. So, let the rudimentary needs be fulfilled first followed by art.
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 54
- “Nation’s should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers oftheir citizens are hungry or unemployed.” 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...e ability to work for it. That requires a lots of strength and need to work hard for i...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'in particular']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214424951267 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.165692007797 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0779727095517 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0506822612086 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046783625731 0.0444667217837 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11306042885 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0389863547758 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65444570511 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0409356725146 0.030933414821 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00194931773879 0.0016655270985 117% => OK
Determiners: 0.120857699805 0.0997080785238 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0350877192982 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0136452241715 0.0148568991511 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2739.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 478.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73012552301 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.284518828452 0.366273622748 78% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23640167364 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173640167364 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115062761506 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65444570511 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 219.290929204 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466527196653 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 52.9490352602 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.12 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.059130246 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.56 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.12 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 42.760167364 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.39259259259 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211586345588 0.391690518653 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134344047488 0.123202303941 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100670282534 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.581938364483 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176190361716 0.149214159877 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793211377736 0.161403998019 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777001541495 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.349925225724 0.385218514788 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0641797072482 0.0692045440612 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138989189195 0.275328986314 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078167957973 0.0653680567796 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6