To Begin with, Scandals do bring attentions of problems that any leader or reformer may not express. However, exposure of these scandals doesn’t help an individual except from giving a closure on how corrupted or avarice a person can be. In our world many scandals occur every single day but, all these scandals are not brought it to lime light so these all the scandals don’t bring out an outrage in the public or solve the problem.
Firstly, we know many scandals in the past that have shocked people and also exposed the people involved in the illegal activities. One such example is Bernie Madoff Scandal whose company was a Wallstreet Invesment firm. He tricked investors out of $64.8 billion through largest Ponzi scheme. He was later arrested and has a restitution of $170 billion, this scandal was revealed just months after 2008 U.S financial collapse. This scandal would help people know about the illegal activities a person involves. Scandals have an impact on the country’s economy and might devitalize it. Hence, they affect the people in the society which is more important than just understanding a problem.
Scandals are useful only to know the reality of some people especially in the field of politics, Business or celebrates. But, these scandals don’t help in the betterment of the country. Indeed, they lead to many more problems. For example, some political leader use the money given by the government for the development of the country, for their own use. These scandals might not be exposed and hence, don’t help the public focus attention in the problem. This unethical behaviour would worsen the living conditions of public as they are not directly benefited by the government.
Accordingly, Many Scandals that happen in a country either related to money or drugs or sexual harassment would make a country unsafe to live or prosper. However, the fact that these scandals help to get closure of a society cannot be belittled. Another example of a famous scandal would be Satyam ltd, where the company main operator Ramalinga Raju has shown as assets in billions which wasn’t true and admitted in doing so in a letter to the board of directors. If we look at the exposed scandals, the person is punished for his behaviour and can even be a message to people who commit such illegal activities and dire then from doing so.
To sum, Scandals help people to know about the present scenario of a society or the past and bring a better closure. However, this would not help in the development of a country and can even damage the economy which would affect the public.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 70
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment. Discuss some arguments for and /or against keeping animals in zoo. 56
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 54
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to natural environment Discuss some arguments for and or against keeping animals in zoo 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...l was revealed just months after 2008 U.S financial collapse. This scandal would ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238095238095 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.16149068323 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0662525879917 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.055900621118 0.0497285424764 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0248447204969 0.0444667217837 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109730848861 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0393374741201 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53264854946 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227743271222 0.030933414821 74% => OK
Particles: 0.00207039337474 0.0016655270985 124% => OK
Determiners: 0.134575569358 0.0997080785238 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0269151138716 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0186335403727 0.0148568991511 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2607.0 2732.02544248 95% => OK
No of words: 442.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89819004525 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373303167421 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280542986425 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183257918552 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0904977375566 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53264854946 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 219.290929204 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502262443439 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 56.8720773823 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0909090909 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8899828259 59.4972553346 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 48.1452077334 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.59829059829 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351013128233 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0880049856779 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0614675103618 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503629304243 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161562331759 0.149214159877 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132869351847 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739094064957 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375289675889 0.385218514788 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104166713501 0.0692045440612 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246303830827 0.275328986314 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034458335283 0.0653680567796 53% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.30420353982 302% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 14.0 3.66592920354 382% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.