What an important aspect of human beings' lives which plays a prominent role int their prosperities, to a great extent, is their jobs. Although there is a consequence on its indisputable role, the best way to work is still amoot point. Germane to this fact, a question which is the matter of debate, a controversial one, is whether working three days for long hours is better that working five days for shorter hours. Although some people may be on the belief that working five is more enjoyable, I am personally of the conviction that working three days is far preferable for two conspicuous reasons.
One compelling reason giving in favor of this thesis is that we will enjoy our life more. To elucidate more on this issue, if we work three days a week, we will have two more days free time, in comparison with a five-days job. We can spend this extra time with our family or do activities that mkae us happy. For instance, I work in a company three days a week. Therefore, I utilize the other four days of a week to get some rest and go out with my family. Every week, we go to the movies, and after that to a restaurant for lunch. Moreover, I have started learning the piano since last month, which I had always wanted to learn. This taught me that I would not be this much contented with my life and work if it were not because of my three-days job.
Another reason which cannot go unnoticed is that if we work three days a week, we can save more money. To shed some light on this premise, it is worth poining out that everyday that we go to work, we need to spend money on transportation. We need to pay for gas or public transportaion. Nonetheless, if we work only for three days a week, we can save money of two days' transportation. As an illustration, according to the results of a research published in an academic journal, Americans virtually spend 10% of their wages on going to work and lunch. This means that people spend a huge amount of money on these costs, and if they go to work two days less, they can save a lot of money. As you can see, people can save more moeny if they go to work three days a week.
To wrap it up, I am personally one of the proponents who cites a clear bias in favor the idea that working three days a week is more enjoyable that five days a week. To recapitulate the reasons, not only will we enjoy our life more, but also we can have the opportunity to decrease a great deal of our costs. To my way of thinking, everyone should try to find a job where he/she works only three days a week.
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO 31- Integrated Task 76
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 70
- TPO 19- Independent Task 71
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s premise, it is worth poining out that everyday that we go to work, we need to spend mo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...cans virtually spend 10% of their wages on going to work and lunch. This means that peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to decrease a great deal of our costs. To my way of thinking, everyone should try...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203738317757 0.229887763892 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.157009345794 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0635514018692 0.0866891130778 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0429906542056 0.046263068375 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0785046728972 0.0685040099705 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115887850467 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0280373831776 0.0351676179071 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50260387994 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0392523364486 0.0309702414327 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00560747663551 0.00188951952338 297% => OK
Determiners: 0.0990654205607 0.0887237588012 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0261682242991 0.0209618222197 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014953271028 0.0139019557991 108% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2538.0 2387.08602151 106% => OK
No of words: 481.0 408.028673835 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27650727651 5.86048508987 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.214137214137 0.338922669872 63% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.14553014553 0.251872472559 58% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.106029106029 0.174417080927 61% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0790020790021 0.112833075102 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50260387994 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455301455301 0.524397521467 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.5030429424 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8636363636 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7539883504 48.84282405 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.363636364 120.699889404 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8636363636 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 36.4166509167 45.7405998639 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.24832214765 1.45489161554 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372274893733 0.300154397459 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140136416561 0.103427244359 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0926160457859 0.0752933317313 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494277995262 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129052811435 0.151897553556 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142128909396 0.114077575197 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726606149906 0.0781384742642 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.379045531837 0.336927656856 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0907970890968 0.067059652881 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258537132253 0.210909579961 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304403180268 0.0618886996521 49% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.