Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spends more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
With advances of technology, the number of cars in streets in growing every day and it brings a lot of problems to human’s life such as air and water pollution, global warming, various diseases heavy traffic. I think that the government should invest on public transportation to solve these kinds of problems.
First of all, I think that spending that money on public transportation will decrease many problems that people are dangling with them these days. If the public transportation improves, many people relinquish the use of their own car and they will resort to public transportation. Using public transportation will lessen the vehicle emissions that releases toxic gases to the air and it makes a hole in ozone layer which caused the global warming and also it brings lots of different diseases for human such as asthma, heart diseases, angina, etc. My aunt has asthma and when the air is polluted she should stay at home and use some special drugs and masks. Last year the air was really polluted and when she went to the drug store to buy her drugs, she could not breathe and she went to the hospital. There are a lot of people like her that need fresh air to live and the government should make the city better place for them.
Spending money on urban transportation service will lessen the heavily congested streets which makes people angry, unhappy and tired. Using public vehicles not only lessen the traffic and the time that people spend on move to and fro every day but also lessen the time that they spend on streets and decrease the number of car accidents.
To sum up, if the government improves public transportation and courage people to use these kind of vehicles instead of their own cars, it will lessen the pollution in air and water and make cities better places for all people especially the ones that suffer from diseases that become worth in polluted air and it also brings happiness to people.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 86
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ransportation and courage people to use these kind of vehicles instead of their own cars, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'i think', 'kind of', 'such as', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276536312849 0.229887763892 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.148044692737 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0810055865922 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0307262569832 0.046263068375 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0558659217877 0.0685040099705 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103351955307 0.118717715034 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0251396648045 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49742125857 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0335195530726 0.0309702414327 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.00188951952338 148% => OK
Determiners: 0.0893854748603 0.0887237588012 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251396648045 0.0209618222197 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0279329608939 0.0139019557991 201% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1928.0 2387.08602151 81% => OK
No of words: 335.0 408.028673835 82% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7552238806 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.319402985075 0.338922669872 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.188059701493 0.251872472559 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134328358209 0.174417080927 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0746268656716 0.112833075102 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49742125857 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.524397521467 94% => OK
Word variations: 50.5848355863 59.2087087015 85% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6684587814 53% => OK
Sentence length: 30.4545454545 20.5533526081 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2332081777 48.84282405 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.272727273 120.699889404 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4545454545 20.5533526081 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.644075263715 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 49.2605156038 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.72619047619 1.45489161554 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189019736917 0.300154397459 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.189170225026 0.103427244359 183% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0875823028889 0.0752933317313 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.637444731485 0.497263757937 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185208960161 0.151897553556 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110245323249 0.114077575197 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333099679519 0.0781384742642 43% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.431699606729 0.336927656856 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0499324615142 0.067059652881 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145206902485 0.210909579961 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276847031065 0.0618886996521 45% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8870967742 34% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 13.6433691756 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.