working hours have something to do with our satisfaction of our live
As humans living in a civilized society, we are all eager to know how to use our time more efficiently. Whether or not working hours have something to do with our satisfaction of our lives has always been a controversial issue among many people. Although some psychologists argue as if it is a general truth that working more frequently in a week with the shorter amount of time needed to work each day is better than working in fewer numbers of days with the longer amount of working hours each day, I strongly contend that the latter is a more logical choice. Among countless reasons and examples which can vindicate my point of view, I'll pinpoint the two most conspicuous ones through following paragraphs.
The first thing that juts out of mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this subject is the fact that by taking people's hectic lives into account, anyone can come to the idea that people need more vacation time in order to be disposed of all the stresses and obstacles which accompany with new ways of life. A twenty-first-century person experiences being stocked in several traffic jams which can be really irritating, and the less the exposure to hectic life, the more being pacified and calm the person. An example can illuminate this claim to some extent. There was a problem with all the workers of Microsoft Company in 2003. They were really high-tempered and were not able to control their anger and treated their costumes in a really annoying manner. The founder of this company, Bill Gates, decided to reduce their working days from five days a week to three days. After a month or two, all the costumes left this company while they were really satisfied with the way the employees treated them.
The second thing that is worth bearing in mind is the fact that, this will diminish the unemployment critic all over the world. It goes without saying that a given company or office needs to provide its consumers with everyday support. Consequently, it should hire many employees who are active and fresh enough to work efficiently during their working hours because they have gotten plenty of rest during their off days. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, which was gathered from a research conducted on all the mineral water producing factories in Australia, revealed that from the spot that their working policy changed from working five days of short hours of working to three days of long hours, they observed many remarkable changes in several aspects. Not only did their employees' efficiency increase by twenty-seven percent, but also the unemployment critic of Australia decreased by about five and a half percent.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, there are many reasons which can be persuasive enough for people in order to understand that the benefits of working three days of long hours outweigh the advantages of working five days of short hours. Some reasons are mentioned above such as its ability to heighten the workers' efficiency, preventing them from being stressful and its ability to decrease the amount of unemployment in a given society. But that was just a story in a nut shell. Obviously, there are many other reasons and examples, challenging the claim, which are not mentioned. All in all, employers should consider these issues thoroughly while deciding about their working policies.
- 1. Government officials should rely on their judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reaso 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people should try several different jobs before they take a long term career 35
- tpo46 80
- Your school is going to improve the teaching quality of the teachers of their high school students(ages 14-18), which of the following methods do you think is better:1. To choose a group of excellent teachers; the teachers will attend an additional traini 76
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for t 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...w how to use our time more efficiently. Whether or not working hours have something to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...w how to use our time more efficiently. Whether or not working hours have something to do with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 638, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...s which can vindicate my point of view, Ill pinpoint the two most conspicuous ones ...
^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ove such as its ability to heighten the workers efficiency, preventing them from being ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.156862745098 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0882352941176 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047385620915 0.046263068375 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0424836601307 0.0685040099705 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138888888889 0.118717715034 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0351676179071 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66320327392 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.0309702414327 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0016339869281 0.00188951952338 86% => OK
Determiners: 0.107843137255 0.0887237588012 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0130718954248 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016339869281 0.0139019557991 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3391.0 2387.08602151 142% => OK
No of words: 569.0 408.028673835 139% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95957820738 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.48200974243 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342706502636 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260105448155 0.251872472559 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163444639719 0.174417080927 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103690685413 0.112833075102 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66320327392 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516695957821 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 64.0688356168 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0952380952 20.5533526081 132% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4403028522 48.84282405 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.476190476 120.699889404 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0952380952 20.5533526081 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.47619047619 0.644075263715 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 53.1057829107 45.7405998639 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.75496688742 1.45489161554 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255936656967 0.300154397459 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0803255674961 0.103427244359 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0670497510872 0.0752933317313 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.449195948659 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161393206062 0.151897553556 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09475105352 0.114077575197 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117757754917 0.0781384742642 151% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.444097558948 0.336927656856 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0472501364847 0.067059652881 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197234300298 0.210909579961 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109477445147 0.0618886996521 177% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.86379928315 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.