In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view
Human beings have different background, including education, area of expertise, belief, or moral reasoning process. For example, some people may prefer utilitarianism; some people may prefer justice and fairness.
Contrasting ideas may spur their discussion by comparing and contrasting their reasonings. However, people having similar ideas will just agree and stop there.
The Great Compromise would be a great example of showing the superiority of discussion between contrasting ideas. States having large population wanted to retain their power, whereas states having small population wanted to grasp power. They discussed their reasonings behind and reached the conclusion, and the conclusion became the basis of current US congress. As shown above, contrasting ideas can generate hybrid, but developed policy by encompassing the both view. Some may believe discussion between contracting idea may be not effective because they will hinder the process. However, fast process will be risky because it will cause hastiness and cursoriness. Some may question what if no decision is made? That is why most of the countries in the world adopted democracy.
A contrasting idea can also play a role as ‘watchdog’ for the opponent. In Korea, Myung Bak Lee, a former president of Republic of Korea, had an ambitious economic plan saving the suburban area. However, the plan has had encountered many criticism by environmentalists. After long and enthusiastic discussions, the plan encompassed the environmentalists’ concern. Furthermore, the environmentalists could monitor whether the plan keeps the environmental guideline. Consequently, through the discussion between the contrasting idea, Korea could grasp the two contrasting concept: Environment and economy
Furthermore, by having contrasting ideas, people can learn from a new perspective. As aforementioned, people have different idea since they have different area of expertise or culture. Imagine that a marketing department of your company came up with an idea. However, in fact, the marketing idea did not consider the financial burden of the company. If the marketing department proceed the idea without checking with other departments, such as finance department that have opposing idea, it may be detrimental, not beneficial, to the company. If they have had a meeting with different department which have different opinion, the plan could have helped the company.
People tend to be lethargic; without rivalry, there would be slower process. In fact, many psychology journals have examined the effect of rivalry. Discussion between two similar opinions will not spark enthusiastic discussion. However, through discussion between the two contrasting ideas, people can develop a plan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | shahajan999 | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | sazid | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrastingpoints of view 16
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 70
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 16
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view. 16
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rasting concept: Environment and economy Furthermore, by having contrasting ideas...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'for example', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2625 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.164583333333 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0791666666667 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0291666666667 0.0497285424764 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229166666667 0.0444667217837 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102083333333 0.12292977631 83% => OK
Participles: 0.05625 0.0406280797675 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.26804575084 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00833333333333 0.030933414821 27% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00208333333333 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.0979166666667 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.04375 0.0249443105267 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104166666667 0.0148568991511 70% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2777.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 408.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.80637254902 6.0361032391 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.448529411765 0.366273622748 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.355392156863 0.280924506359 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.274509803922 0.200843997647 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.200980392157 0.132149295362 152% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26804575084 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531862745098 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 60.1888396118 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.1111111111 23.380412469 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4537401575 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.851851852 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 23.380412469 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.481481481481 0.674092028746 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.6503267974 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.94230769231 1.64882698954 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16356879394 0.391690518653 42% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105990814041 0.123202303941 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100878313109 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470771270009 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141524426452 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602748793577 0.161403998019 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470064986391 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.247039818747 0.385218514788 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0950145199783 0.0692045440612 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112635715469 0.275328986314 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367503242232 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88274336283 246% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.70907079646 369% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.