In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Discussion is the important aspect which is needed to be followed when trying to develop some projects, tasks, law or anything which has some impact. Discussion will not always lead to a solution but it will excite one to try his/her best to counter or solve the contrasting views. Before, starting any projects it is the discussion on how to tackle a particular problem. When, a contrasting view arise discussion will make sure to take the optimal path which will definitely lead oneself to success. I do agree that discussion is important and one must do among people who have contrasting points of view.
Discussion is not an extraneous but major aspect which make sure that all colleague or people to have some views before proceeding. For example, When there is a need to either rescind or make a law its discussion which triggers the process. In India the law which restricts a tech giant from keeping Indians activity data in foreign country the discussion by Ministry of Telecom triggered the discussion between the ruling party and opposition to make sure that each and every member of parliament is agreeing with the law. Once the discussion is over after resolving all the contrasting view the draft is prepared and passed in both the houses of parliament. After, getting approved with majority of members it goes to President to be signed into law.
Similarly, When Microsoft proposed to buy Activision Game Company it was the discussion which came into affect. When there was discussion between executive's of both company which lead the formulate the agreements and solve the discrepancy between the valuation of company. After this discussion, the CEO of Gaming Company actively tried to resolve the contrasting views between board of members by having discussion with them. So, the whole company employees and other related people should unitedly take decision. And after some time the deal was announced.
Even in some case like I tried to developing a hotel management software with the friend of mine. It was discussion which helped me to find the path, technologies and strategy which needed to be followed to successfully accomplish it. When there cam a time of deploying on cloud and opening for public purpose discussion helped me a lot.
Not every discussion results out in firm decision but at least tries to find the optimal path. Some time discussion takes huge amount of time to resolve queries but its ok if one simple discussion is eliminating the bad outcome then it is nice to have it. So, in each example stated above discussion was an important factor which tried to resolve the contrasting views and made every one those related to the subject on same page in either agreeing or disagreeing form.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
- xzcsdsad 16
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Others people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others 83
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of old historic buildings 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...counter or solve the contrasting views. Before, starting any projects it is the discus...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... on how to tackle a particular problem. When, a contrasting view arise discussion wi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hat each and every member of parliament is agreeing with the law. Once the discussion is ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 660, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...assed in both the houses of parliament. After, getting approved with majority of memb...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...y it was the discussion which came into affect. When there was discussion between exec...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n executives of both company which lead the formulate the agreements and solve the discrepanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: IT_IS[8]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e amount of time to resolve queries but its ok if one simple discussion is eliminat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, then, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94565217391 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67135880125 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49347826087 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7484170334 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246345417318 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820640993057 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878727383848 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142119967112 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761679159302 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.