Some people believe that the government should provide financial assistance to all artists including painters, musicians and poets. Others think that it is a waste of money. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
People have a varied opinion whether the government should assist a financial support to the artists or not. However, while it is true that the government should help artists, I would argue that spending money on artists is not a waste of money
It is often said that art forms are an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. They maintain that by providing financial assisting to artists, the government can help protect the cultural heritage of the country. Moreover, they point out the advent of films and television has considerably affected the popularity of other art forms, and without such support from the governments could mean that many ethnic art forms will die out.
However, despite this argument, I would argue that spending money on arts and artists is wasteful as there are several other sectors that desperately need government funding. For example, in many undeveloped and developing countries millions of people do not have an access to safe drinking water, and even proper education for many children s beyond reach. Meeting these requirements is far more important than protecting the nation's art forms from extinction.
In conclusion i tend to feel that the government support in arts is unjustified, and therefore, could be better spend on other development factors which are much needed
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below show the propotion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skillsDo you agree or disagree 74
- The above line graph interprets the changes in the amount and type of 3 different fast food consumed by Australian teenagers over a period of 25 years starting from 1975. 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...money on artists is not a waste of money It is often said that art forms are an i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ountries millions of people do not have an access to safe drinking water, and even proper...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...forms from extinction. In conclusion i tend to feel that the government suppor...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'moreover', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25321888412 0.247107183377 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.167381974249 0.155533422707 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0987124463519 0.0946595960268 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0600858369099 0.0501214627716 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0257510729614 0.0437548338989 59% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137339055794 0.122226691241 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0386266094421 0.0403226058552 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70989214061 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0171673819742 0.0326793684256 53% => OK
Particles: 0.00858369098712 0.00163938923432 524% => OK
Determiners: 0.0815450643777 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0343347639485 0.021408717616 160% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00429184549356 0.011925033212 36% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1325.0 1933.35771543 69% => OK
No of words: 215.0 316.048096192 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16279069767 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.20517956788 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376744186047 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302325581395 0.28420135186 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223255813953 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13488372093 0.137316102897 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70989214061 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.037074148 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.56093040696 108% => OK
Word variations: 59.9768874305 60.7387585426 99% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0891783567 50% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 26.875 20.7743622355 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3272431618 49.517814964 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.625 127.492653851 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.7743622355 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 57.1075581395 49.1944974215 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.69491525424 1.69124875643 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376526470167 0.332605444948 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113505083786 0.102741220458 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0963038182212 0.0668466124924 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.647935881994 0.534860350844 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.178687792215 0.148594505496 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175620038524 0.134430193775 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788758626388 0.0742795772207 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.252534150449 0.324371583561 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0409487423101 0.0638462369009 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244636604509 0.228012699653 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854719536399 0.058150111329 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 10.4468937876 67% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.