Transportation mode in one European country.
The bar chart depicts the prevalence of main four transportation modes to reach workplace in one of the European city over a consecutive gap of 2 decades since 1960 to 2000, measured in percentage.
Over the period as a whole, the cars became increasingly popular amongst this European city, whereas the other modes such as bike, and journey by foot lost its popularity.
In brief, in the fall of 1960, only 5% of people used the car in order to reach workplace but in the next 2 decades, the popularity of car rose by approximately 20% and ended at 25%, in the year 1981. In lateral 2 decades, car users in this European city elevated significantly and one-third of the population started using cars, at the end of the year 2000. For the buses, popularity fluctuated over a time, but in the year 2000, the number of bus users was nearly same as that in the year 1960. Meanwhile, the slight variation observed , in the year 1980.
For other transportation mode such as bike lost its popularity over a time among this European cities, as in 1980, 5% bike uses preferred another way of transportation to reach workplace with compared to 1960. Additionally, in the year 2000, these users steeply dipped to approximately 7%, which was an abrupt fall in this European city bike users. However, the trend also was same in the case of pedestrians. Significantly, every two decades number of pedestrians dropped by half as compared to the previously analysed year. The ratio of the pedestrians were 35%, 17%, 9% in the year 1960 9080 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view | |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view |
- Due to technology, our traditional skills and was of living is altered. we can not prevent these change. what extent do u agree or disagree? 73
- Co2 emission in main four region in between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012 79
- Comparison between the Japanese tourist numbers in between 1985 and 1995. 78
- Care use lane in 1999. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Meanwhile, the slight variation observed , in the year 1980. For other transpor...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'third', 'whereas', 'while', 'in brief', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.269230769231 0.268076937826 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.0897435897436 0.116061578633 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0576923076923 0.0759168565197 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0384615384615 0.0366838410393 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00641025641026 0.0131127313244 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.163461538462 0.155750635184 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0352564102564 0.0379272487307 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83690406806 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224358974359 0.0210936926555 106% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.128205128205 0.0948980150116 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00320512820513 0.00967000014798 33% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1546.0 1161.00487805 133% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.9 137% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72592592593 5.90752243213 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73763899035 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.255555555556 0.337110787985 76% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.207407407407 0.247514529752 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159259259259 0.171178102325 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107407407407 0.112407865282 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83690406806 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514814814815 0.546246751206 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.952932358 49.3433353143 101% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.5454545455 23.0094962315 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9126730176 42.9750493124 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.545454545 135.714022679 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 23.0094962315 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.689975730869 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 45.2861952862 47.7609492067 95% => OK
Elegance: 3.47619047619 2.94281807926 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189228699675 0.418131533498 45% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178928376002 0.181151798455 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0829612725651 0.0850326197045 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.695600178402 0.706616315825 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189389375018 0.157042692854 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100230078526 0.228904883108 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645365832132 0.108899403657 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.367025729076 0.367819155151 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.184574944499 0.0812612215331 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136099970525 0.316326947829 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599541350598 0.0921553760075 65% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.