The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
While some may argue that the effectiveness of a country’s leader is based on an examination of the well-being of the country’s citizens, others may contend that there are other metrics for the effectiveness of a leader. Such metrics could include, but are not limited to the leadership style, charisma of a leader, to mention a few. Therefore I agree with the statement; however we cannot but acknowledge the presence of other yardsticks or metrics of measuring the effectiveness of a leader.
Undoubtedly, if the citizens of a country are doing well during a particular leader’s administration, the citizens of the country will see such a leader as being an efficacious leader. For instance, during Obasanjo’s administration as the President of Nigeria, he was lauded for his ability to create more job opportunities, and improve the Nigerian economy generally. In addition to this, Nigerians considered the communities as being safer during his regime. Moreover, he was able to put Nigeria in the global economy by portraying Nigeria in a positive light. By contrast, the same cannot be said of Good luck Jonathan, because the economy was almost at a meltdown resulting in an economic depression. There was the insurgence of terrorism and kidnapping. In light of this, Nigerians would consider the former President Obasanjo an effective leader because of his ability to improve the well- being of the Nigerian Citizens.
However one cannot ignore the other factors and yardsticks that can be used to measure the effectiveness of a country’s leader. For instance the leadership style of a leader can be used to measure the effectiveness of a leader. A dictatorial leadership cannot be said to be an effective one because of the tendency for such a leader to impose his will on his citizens despite opposition from the citizens. The North Korea’s President has been accused of being an ineffective leader because he adopts a dictatorship style of government.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of a leader can be measured by the well-being of the citizens; however other factors and yardsticks exist in measuring the leader’s effectiveness.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little i 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little i 58
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...charisma of a leader, to mention a few. Therefore I agree with the statement; however we ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25304136253 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.12895377129 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0705596107056 0.0880659088768 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0340632603406 0.0497285424764 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243309002433 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143552311436 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0413625304136 0.0406280797675 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.35727325489 2.79330140395 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243309002433 0.030933414821 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.141119221411 0.0997080785238 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0316301703163 0.0249443105267 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00243309002433 0.0148568991511 16% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2188.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 347.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.30547550432 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414985590778 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.342939481268 0.280924506359 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.236311239193 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184438040346 0.132149295362 140% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35727325489 2.79330140395 120% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 219.290929204 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449567723343 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.6589023704 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1333333333 23.380412469 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8347757349 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.866666667 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 23.380412469 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 57.4272814601 51.4728631049 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.33766233766 1.64882698954 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526915562449 0.391690518653 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168369283771 0.123202303941 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0998136422262 0.077325440228 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.631293291412 0.547984918172 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.161179266054 0.149214159877 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269344439009 0.161403998019 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102811239562 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.515874963928 0.385218514788 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.017916757821 0.0692045440612 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.428556487236 0.275328986314 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432908551538 0.0653680567796 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.