The above line graph interprets the changes in the amount and type of 3 different fast food consumed by Australian teenagers over a period of 25 years starting from 1975.
Having analysed given information 2 types of trends could be identified with regard to all 3 types of fast food intake such as upward and downward. Pizza intake has increased over 25 years and reached its peak at around 82 times per year in 2000 from 5 times a year in 1975. At the same time Hamburgers consumption which stood at the same as Pizza in 1975 has shown a drastic increase as it has gone up to 100 times per year in 2000. Whereas Fish and Chips intake which was at 100 times per year in 1975 has reduced by 60% in 2000. Though it showed a slight incline by 10 times in 1985 when compared to previous year, it has started to drop from next year onwards.
It can be concluded that, fast food consumption towards Pizza and Hamburgers is having an upward trend and Fish and Chips consumption is having a downward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-26 | tvaishnavi | 67 | view |
| 2016-08-26 | tvaishnavi | 67 | view |
- Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantagesGive reasons for your answers, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 100
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skillsDo you agree or disagree 74
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'whereas', 'such as', 'with regard to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248484848485 0.268076937826 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.175757575758 0.116061578633 151% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0727272727273 0.0759168565197 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0121212121212 0.0366838410393 33% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.030303030303 0.0131127313244 231% => OK
Prepositions: 0.169696969697 0.155750635184 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0787878787879 0.0379272487307 208% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.31333888955 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0242424242424 0.0210936926555 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0484848484848 0.0948980150116 51% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0121212121212 0.00437022459523 277% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181818181818 0.00967000014798 188% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 831.0 1161.00487805 72% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.9 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32692307692 5.90752243213 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.24358974359 0.337110787985 72% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.147435897436 0.247514529752 60% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.102564102564 0.171178102325 60% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0641025641026 0.112407865282 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31333888955 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 49.7943382769 49.3433353143 101% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0094962315 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2217361058 42.9750493124 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 135.714022679 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.0094962315 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.84146341463 52% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 40.7435897436 47.7609492067 85% => OK
Elegance: 2.27777777778 2.94281807926 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20132505807 0.418131533498 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.176830942157 0.181151798455 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.124499600306 0.0850326197045 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.627626811744 0.706616315825 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.210309290981 0.157042692854 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103726979535 0.228904883108 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335565296783 0.108899403657 31% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.146375619642 0.367819155151 40% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0812612215331 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13493213641 0.316326947829 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616562585775 0.0921553760075 67% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.