Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is thought by some people that high price of gasoline will encourage people to use more of the local transport and the number of traffic jams will be decreased.
To some extent, I agree with this statement. However, there are some aspects governments should take into account when gas have become more expansive.
First of all, costly gas will probably course rage and disappointment of masses. There is a possibility that folks will think that local authorities just want to refill their own pockets. Undisputable, traffic density has been thinning for the last decade in Ukraine due petrol price increasing. However, people has been trying to find other source of income to allow themselves keep on using cars. As you see, increasing the price won’t affect traffic problems. Therefore, pollution problems will stay unresolved.
In my opinion, there are a lot of more efficient solutions of this problem. To give a clear example, five years ago Japanese engineers invented a new type of the underground train. It’s able to accelerate about 300 km per hour for 20 seconds. This train is totally electrical; it doesn’t produce carbon dioxide as car. Moreover, there are completely nose isolated carriage. So, you won’t even notice the speed you moving.
There is also one thing we need to remember. Contemporary people have become more materialistic and consumptive. It’s very important for many of us to have an expansive car and boast it with your friends. As a result, youth are ready to pay the price they couldn’t afford to buy costly cars instead of spending their money for healthy food. I think, governments ought to motivate people to use local transport, bicycles, or e-mobiles for their movements.
In conclusion, I want to say, that high price of the petrol will not totally resolve a problem. Members of society should pay more attention to environment condition and understand the value of the nation. This is the main way to make our air more clear.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-07 | sanakhalid1234 | 11 | view |
| 2017-07-07 | sanakhalid1234 | 73 | view |
| 2016-09-01 | max1991 | 84 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves 92
- A University should accept male and female students equally in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 67
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbors.In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologize.Describe what action you will take. 84
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary school to universities too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he main way to make our air more clear.
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232911392405 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.167088607595 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0911392405063 0.0946595960268 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0481012658228 0.0501214627716 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.053164556962 0.0437548338989 122% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0886075949367 0.122226691241 72% => OK
Participles: 0.0329113924051 0.0403226058552 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78935402338 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405063291139 0.0326793684256 124% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0683544303797 0.0861772015684 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0227848101266 0.021408717616 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00506329113924 0.011925033212 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2013.0 1933.35771543 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 316.048096192 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348484848485 0.374742101984 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266666666667 0.28420135186 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.203846283523 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145454545455 0.137316102897 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78935402338 2.80594681477 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.037074148 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.56093040696 111% => OK
Word variations: 74.22915402 60.7387585426 122% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0891783567 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.347826087 20.7743622355 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.432111684 49.517814964 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5217391304 127.492653851 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.347826087 20.7743622355 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.814263465372 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 41.0144927536 49.1944974215 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.32075471698 1.69124875643 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362767782651 0.332605444948 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0574563322395 0.102741220458 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0486512633615 0.0668466124924 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.456564615012 0.534860350844 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17528368595 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10957828113 0.134430193775 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669292793473 0.0742795772207 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.15825596973 0.324371583561 49% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0810032852702 0.0638462369009 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20141445879 0.228012699653 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647482811602 0.058150111329 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.