Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can damage our relationships with them. Which one do you agree with? Why?
There is no doubt that everyone in his daily life get familiar with different individuals who leave profound effects on him and maybe make friends with some of them. The simple recognition of the argument lends our discussion to the questions of how two close friends can cement their relationship. Although some people adhere to this belief that they should be far away from each other to perceive the value of relationship, I believe it poses a threat to their friendship, since it weakens their emotion bond and also they cannot help each other.
The first aspect to point out is that what damages friends’ relationship those are far from each other is weakening their emotional relationship. In fact, at the turn of the new century, with the development of human modern society, there are a lot of weights of obsession on people’s minds; so if friends are far from each other, they do not have enough time to interact with each other, express their emotion and fortify their relationship. To illustrate more, take a case of two friends who are making friends for several years for instance. If they live near each other, they can go gym and play computer games every day. Not only can they have endless hours of sheer fun, but also they enjoy from being with each other. Hence, a person can strengthen his relationship with friends who are near him.
A furthermore subtle point is that what provokes close friends not living far away from each other is helping each other in catastrophic circumstance. Indeed human life is analogous with a tortuous way in mountain in quite a few aspects. It is axiomatic that everyone in his life runs into huge problems and he need supports of his close friends. Should his close friends live in the vicinity of him, he can cope the problems by the assistance of them. Also, they can psychologically boost his morale and instill precious concepts such as perseverance and diligence to tackle the problems. In this way, he can appreciate the value of his friends who make him more energetic and lively by their presence. In contrast, if his friends do not have physical presence beside him, he will feel lonely. Therefor, their relationship little by little is damaged.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear (obvious) that far distance between two friends can damage their relationship since they cannot express their emotion, and support each other. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that close friends who just communicate through telephone or internet can sustain their relationship. It is anticipated that friends without face to face communication readily forget each other.
- integrated 46 63
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that is a good quality for a person 85
- do you agree or disagree?politicians should have strong social skills in order to become successful? 86
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree? Competitions between friends always has a negative effect on their friends? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ach other in catastrophic circumstance. Indeed human life is analogous with a tortuous...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'no doubt', 'such as', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207171314741 0.229887763892 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.141434262948 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.093625498008 0.0866891130778 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0597609561753 0.046263068375 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0956175298805 0.0685040099705 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.129482071713 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0199203187251 0.0351676179071 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75697717331 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0199203187251 0.0309702414327 64% => OK
Particles: 0.00199203187251 0.00188951952338 105% => OK
Determiners: 0.0816733067729 0.0887237588012 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0298804780876 0.0209618222197 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0159362549801 0.0139019557991 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2691.0 2387.08602151 113% => OK
No of words: 452.0 408.028673835 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95353982301 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329646017699 0.338922669872 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247787610619 0.251872472559 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16814159292 0.174417080927 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.103982300885 0.112833075102 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75697717331 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 58.3275334113 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6741089757 48.84282405 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.55 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.644075263715 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 47.3787610619 45.7405998639 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.20134228188 1.45489161554 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23980009133 0.300154397459 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.123771696071 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792978857503 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480390413489 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143274439694 0.151897553556 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874444575074 0.114077575197 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582105451428 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.388469864101 0.336927656856 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0712495696272 0.067059652881 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176421143229 0.210909579961 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412646398469 0.0618886996521 67% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.