No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
These days, general notion is that collaboration yields significant advancement in a field of study. I agree with this notion for several reasons.
First, a lot of today’s research combines knowledge from different fields to produce more fruitful outcome. Development occurs through expansion of realm of research and study by incorporating different subjects. Take Psychological research for example. In Psychology, demands for knowledge of higher level statistics is increasing since such knowledge aids a lot in analyzing data more accurately; accurate and thorough analysis of gathered data is important in deducing more meaningful conclusion. Through taking different statistical methodologies, different outcomes are yielded, which in many case will be conducive to development of Psychology. If Psychology neglected the importance of collaboration, vast amount of findings in recent years would not have been possible.
Second, it is especially crucial in this competitive society to combine and create synergic effects out of combination. Due to highly competition, taking innovative means for advancement of a field is a much needed approach. Incorporation of engineering and fashion elucidates this. More recently, fashion incorporated with engineering more actively, thus producing quick dry materials, waterproof outfits, and insulating technology. Fashion industry has truly evolved through the combination. Had it not been for the adaptation, people nowadays would not be able to benefit from warm, but thin and stylish jackets, waterproof raincoats, and elastic, but firm jeans, all of which was breakthrough in fashion and in lives of many people.
Admittedly, however, there are some advantages of focusing on a single field. Such approach can prevent hodgepodge of information lacking in content and accuracy. Also, incorporation could distract people from the main objectives of a study, thus wasting resources. Nevertheless, these possibilities do not negate the statement that collaboration yields advancement. Although sometime generating misleading facts and distraction, combination’s synergic effect outweighs possible downside of such method.
All in all, I agree with the statement that every field of study experience immense development through incorporation of knowledge and experience from outside that field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | fufu | 83 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | LMMM | 81 | view |
| 2016-09-09 | rlagusdk | 69 | view |
| 2016-01-26 | DubinchukEugene | 50 | view |
| 2016-01-26 | DubinchukEugene | 70 | view |
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth. 51
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type o 81
- People’s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. 61
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 69
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 78
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: Due to highly competition, taking innovative means for advancement of a field is a much needed approach.
Description: A qualifier, pre is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to highly and competition
Sentence: Second, it is especially crucial in this competitive society to combine and create synergic effects out of combination.
Error: synergic Suggestion: No alternate word
-------------
arguments: OK
-------------
flaws:
No. of Words: 336 //More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 336 350
No. of Characters: 1955 1500
No. of Different Words: 204 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.281 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.818 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.164 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 138 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 104 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.892 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.264 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.494 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.032 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun case seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cases'.
Suggestion: many cases
...ifferent outcomes are yielded, which in many case will be conducive to development of Psy...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289743589744 0.240241500013 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.123076923077 0.157235817809 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115384615385 0.0880659088768 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0512820512821 0.0497285424764 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0102564102564 0.0444667217837 23% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.148717948718 0.12292977631 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0461538461538 0.0406280797675 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.32778955452 2.79330140395 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0128205128205 0.030933414821 41% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0615384615385 0.0997080785238 62% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128205128205 0.0249443105267 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00512820512821 0.0148568991511 35% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2365.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 336.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.03869047619 6.0361032391 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.494047619048 0.366273622748 135% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.419642857143 0.280924506359 149% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.33630952381 0.200843997647 167% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.244047619048 0.132149295362 185% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.32778955452 2.79330140395 119% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616071428571 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 72.7279935456 55.4138127331 131% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7316179187 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 58.7642857143 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.625 1.64882698954 159% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294713919798 0.391690518653 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0593921267703 0.123202303941 48% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0500637191492 0.077325440228 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.469212173439 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180217947282 0.149214159877 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933004526721 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900203647883 0.0892212321368 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.243662785073 0.385218514788 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0551478982585 0.0692045440612 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209209571468 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108872551711 0.0653680567796 167% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.