tpo47
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the whether the pterosaurs were able to fly or not. While the reading part lists three doubts about the validity of this action, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the reading passage.
First of all, the article posits that since they were probably the cold-blooded animal, they did not have the adequate energy required to fly. However, the instructor challenges the validity of this assumption. As she asserts, for the sake of evidence released by the pterosaurs' fossils, they possessed the dense hair like covering just likes the feather, and this covering is typical among the warm-blooded animals. As a result, the pterosaurs were probably warm-blooded, and they had the sufficient energy demanded to fly.
Next, meanwhile, the text mentions to the heavy weight of the pterosaurs as the hinder of the flight, the professor dismisses this issue. As she states, although they owned the huge frame and body, they did not weight too much, inasmuch as their bones were hollow rather than the solid. Therefore, they weighed as little as to be able to keep airborne by flapping their wings despite their massive appearance.
Finally, the passage assumes that due to the lack of powerful back limbs' muscle, they were not capable of jumping high enough. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that they run on their four legs which differ from the modern birds walking trend. Based on her assertion, since they walked on their four limbs, they were able to use their four limbs to push off the land and jump. As a result, there is no demand for the strong back legs, which required for the two-limb birds to take off from the ground, to help them to jump.
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for colleagues or classmates to communicate in person than through emails in order to do a project 58
- tpo42 76
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, because t 35
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...xt, meanwhile, the text mentions to the heavy weight of the pterosaurs as the hinder of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.198830409357 0.261695866417 76% => OK
Verbs: 0.146198830409 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0818713450292 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.0435111971325 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0614035087719 0.0277247811725 221% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122807017544 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0263157894737 0.0370669169778 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40492194397 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0380116959064 0.0208969081088 182% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00584795321637 0.00154638098197 378% => OK
Determiners: 0.137426900585 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00584795321637 0.0114777025283 51% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1802.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90819672131 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.32131147541 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.252459016393 0.287516216867 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180327868852 0.187439937562 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.072131147541 0.113142543107 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40492194397 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 61.1168181875 53.8517498576 113% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.4615384615 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5550089632 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.615384615 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 21.7502111507 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.878197800319 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.7074401009 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.32222222222 1.90840788429 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499871622463 0.549887131256 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147470608902 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0559414620047 0.0787303798458 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.650278315609 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102289799141 0.139662658121 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.247904360731 0.266732575781 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709606050571 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.501945006162 0.414875509568 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0345851924209 0.0530846634433 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363994579192 0.40443939384 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480738574961 0.0528353158467 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.