The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar graph elucidates how many travelers using three distinguish airports in New York City from 1995 to 2000.
Overall, the number of travelers using LaGuardia and Newark rose substantially despite the fact that, LaGuardia had the highest number of travelers, whereas John F. Kennedy airport experienced a periodic fluctuation.
Looking at the detail, John F. Kennedy started at 25 million of passengers in 1995, and the increased remarkably to close to 48 million of passengers in 1997 before it dropped to 32 million in 1999. At the last year, it peaked up its pace to end at 45 million travelers used John F. Kennedy airport.
In contrast, LaGuardia began at 32 million of passengers in 1995, after that it rose substantially for the next three years, at 42 million travelers. By 2000, this incremental trend continued to reach at 68 million travelers.
On the other hand, if we look at Newark airport, which started at the lowest point of 16 million passengers in the first year. After that, this rose continuously to 42 million in 1998 and which figure remained unchanged until 2000.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think children in secondary school should study international news as part of the curriculum. Other think that this would be a waste of time as there are already too many subject for children to concentrate on. Discuss both view and give your 73
- People are living longer than ever before. At the same time, the young population is declining while the number of old people is rising. Will this development be a benefit for the society? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more old peopl 73
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The table shows the changes with the primary income sources for interational students from 2003 04 to 2013 14 in the US 71
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'look', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234146341463 0.268076937826 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.107317073171 0.116061578633 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0536585365854 0.0759168565197 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.019512195122 0.0366838410393 53% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0243902439024 0.0131127313244 186% => OK
Prepositions: 0.170731707317 0.155750635184 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0243902439024 0.0379272487307 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79421830833 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0341463414634 0.0210936926555 162% => OK
Particles: 0.00487804878049 0.00175180941692 278% => OK
Determiners: 0.0731707317073 0.0948980150116 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146341463415 0.00967000014798 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1097.0 1161.00487805 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.9 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96195652174 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336956521739 0.337110787985 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288043478261 0.247514529752 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.171178102325 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141304347826 0.112407865282 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79421830833 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.546246751206 105% => OK
Word variations: 51.8760631729 49.3433353143 105% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.021564239 42.9750493124 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 135.714022679 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.689975730869 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 51.8043478261 47.7609492067 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.83870967742 2.94281807926 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314003326492 0.418131533498 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144013778424 0.181151798455 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.06161991419 0.0850326197045 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.775553122125 0.706616315825 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169883019206 0.157042692854 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164119885385 0.228904883108 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105516583393 0.108899403657 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284048420049 0.367819155151 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.136968409666 0.0812612215331 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221460399479 0.316326947829 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857891508555 0.0921553760075 93% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.