One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property. Electricity companies are then required to purchase the energy through a long-term contract at an increased rate that would allow the investors to more than offset the cost over time. There is no denying that the initial cost of solar installation would be a burden on the investor. In strenuous economic times, both businesses and homeowners might be reluctant to make the investment, with concern that the payout could be less than sufficient or the plan might prove unfeasible. However, research has shown that a feed-in tariff plan is not only stable but also exceptionally effective, and ought to be more actively pursued.
The argument promotes the use of renewable energy in the form of feed-in tariff. The author have considered various assumption which has led to unstated questions which needed to be answered to promote such policies.
Solar energy is a renewable form of energy with sun being the source but a expensive source of energy. The author has not mentioned here the amount of solar energy can be generated with the individual solar panel. To lit a home with two bedrooms, three to four solar panels are required. Now to supply solar energy to electric companies, the number of solar panels which needs to be installed is not known. The investors should first make a note of the amount of solar energy which can be generated from an individual solar panel.
In the above paragraph, it is mentioned that solar energy generated from the individual solar panel needs to be measured. As sun being the source of solar energy, the light varies every day. On one day, it will be sunny whereas on other day, it will not. This doesn't guarantee the amount of electricity which can be generated in a day and make solar energy the germane source.
It is said that Electricity companies have to purchase the energy at a higher cost than the usual cost they bear from other source of energy. There will be an increased cost of electricity per watt to the residents of the city. This will alter their household budget and affect the life of the people in a way that they have to redo the math to sustain on such high cost of electricity. It will not make difference for the rich people but will affect the life of the indigent people. Any policy which is to implemented should give residents the top priority.
The author shows the result of the research showing the effectiveness of the solar energy although due to high the cost of installations, people will be skeptical to invest in such a thing. This is true that everyone wants to get return og investments as soon as possible. If there will be less use of electricity due to the increased cost of electricity, the return of investment will take longer time making a bad investments for the investors.
In sum, the author should considerother effects of implementing such policy and also do a research on other forms of renewable source of energy which are comparitively cheaper. They should also do a survey among the people whether they will be ready to pay higher cost of electricity. This argument fails to convince for implementing the abovementioned policy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-03 | adhgna@gmail.com | 42 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | jaychakalasiya | 82 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | Ap1397 | 37 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | Ap1397 | 37 | view |
| 2018-03-17 | Alvi Jawad | 69 | view |
- sddyjkf 70
- One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their property. Elec 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview:"In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which 50
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 54
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...of energy with sun being the source but a expensive source of energy. The author ...
^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...whereas on other day, it will not. This doesnt guarantee the amount of electricity whi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'investment'?
Suggestion: investment
...ment will take longer time making a bad investments for the investors. In sum, the autho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 89, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...of implementing such policy and also do a research on other forms of renewable source of e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245726495726 0.25644967241 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.160256410256 0.15541462614 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113247863248 0.0836205057962 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.025641025641 0.0520304965353 49% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0213675213675 0.0272364105082 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123931623932 0.125424944231 99% => OK
Participles: 0.042735042735 0.0416121511921 103% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65969459849 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.042735042735 0.026700313972 160% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126068376068 0.113004496875 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0363247863248 0.0255425247493 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149572649573 0.0127820249294 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2506.0 2731.13054187 92% => OK
No of words: 437.0 446.07635468 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73455377574 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320366132723 0.378187486979 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.192219679634 0.287650121315 67% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155606407323 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12356979405 0.135150697306 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65969459849 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 207.018472906 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425629290618 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.249159525 52.1807786196 89% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.039408867 110% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8636363636 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4681452755 57.7814097925 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.909090909 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.724660767414 38% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 39.085604327 51.9672348444 75% => OK
Elegance: 1.98969072165 1.8405768891 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182167677641 0.441005458295 41% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14300111448 0.135418324435 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.096813003318 0.0829849096947 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.60126269358 0.58762219726 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144849179792 0.147661913831 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889883029165 0.193483328276 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478949453853 0.0970749176394 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.486656337275 0.42659136922 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.097435739911 0.0774707102158 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129691235586 0.312017818177 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383170461146 0.0698173142475 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.33743842365 204% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 6.46551724138 201% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.