The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The above bar chart interprets the number of time taken for telephone calls in the UK, by considering 3 main categories such as, local, national and international as well as mobiles for a period of 7 years starting from 1995.

Having analysed the given data, it can be seen that the local fixed line call time remains the highest throughout the period of the survey. Although, it showed an increasing trend until 1999 with a peak amount of 91 billion, it is now showing a decreasing trend. When it comes to other categories, they remain below the local calls. However, show an upward trend. National and international has a slow increase ranging from 40 to 60 billion over the period of time, whereas, mobile usage shows a drastic up from 1995 to 2002 and the amount was approximately 3 billion in 1999 and 42 billion in 2002.

In conclusion, mobile usage has evolved throughout 7 years’ time with the technology improvement. But, still people have not entirely moved into mobile usage from fixed line. However, there will be a forecast future trend towards national and international fixed line and mobile usage, in contrast, local fixed line usage is dropping year by year from 1999.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-04-26 miladpouya 85 view
Essays by user tvaishnavi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... ranging from 40 to 60 billion over the period of time, whereas, mobile usage shows a drastic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'still', 'well', 'whereas', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as well as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212121212121 0.268076937826 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.138528138528 0.116061578633 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108225108225 0.0759168565197 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.038961038961 0.0366838410393 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021645021645 0.0131127313244 165% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138528138528 0.155750635184 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0692640692641 0.0379272487307 183% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.66696851665 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.012987012987 0.0210936926555 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0865800865801 0.0948980150116 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00865800865801 0.00437022459523 198% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.004329004329 0.00967000014798 45% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1196.0 1161.00487805 103% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.9 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86274509804 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31862745098 0.337110787985 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21568627451 0.247514529752 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156862745098 0.171178102325 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.093137254902 0.112407865282 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66696851665 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.546246751206 113% => OK
Word variations: 61.3175241353 49.3433353143 124% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6666666667 23.0094962315 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0952887897 42.9750493124 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 135.714022679 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.0094962315 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 44.2352941176 47.7609492067 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.10869565217 2.94281807926 72% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429575353691 0.418131533498 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1101016379 0.181151798455 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08821465861 0.0850326197045 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546801658052 0.706616315825 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.225806048741 0.157042692854 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16848570904 0.228904883108 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140354574887 0.108899403657 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.27551983689 0.367819155151 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0140181320302 0.0812612215331 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305953450404 0.316326947829 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121690077347 0.0921553760075 132% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.