Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government funding could solve numerous social problems however, these problems should be prioritized and governments should decide which problem to address first.
High rate of unemployment would cause social crisis. When people in one society are unemployed, they could not earn enough money to make ends meet and balance their lives economically. In the worst scenario, unemployed people would not be able even to afford their food and therefore would be hungry. These people have high potent to cause social crisis by burglarizing and stealing from the rich. Thereafter, that society is not secure for its people any longer.
High rate of unemployment and poor economic conditions would eschew people from appreciating art and beauty. When people find themselves unable to accommodate even the slightest needs of their lives such as housing or affording food to eat, they would not spend any money to visit art exhibitions. People living in hard economic conditions would find it more appropriate to spend their tiny amount of money on more important issues such as paying their debts than to buy tickets for an art exhibition.
On the other hand, suspending government funding for the arts permanently would not be a wise decision. Art galleries can provide hundreds of job opportunities for the youth. People who study art at universities need to have a work place after they graduate from their universities. If government does not fund art galleries and abandons these places because of high level of unemployment in the society, this would exacerbate the unemployment rate since these young artists who came out their universities would not find proper jobs. Moreover, artists could use their talents to reflect social problems effectively and force the governments to solve social problems.
To draw a conclusion, nations should prioritize their problems and needs. Governments should use their funding for more critical problems, however eliminating any kind of funding for the arts would double the social problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora."Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora's citizens meet the current standards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all of Corpora's citizens 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 50
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo, Inc., a chain of hobby shops."Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon. We discovered that th 50
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Government funding could solve numerous ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide which problem to address first. High rate of unemployment would cause so...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t secure for its people any longer. High rate of unemployment and poor econo...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... buy tickets for an art exhibition. On the other hand, suspending government...
^^^
Line 7, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e governments to solve social problems. To draw a conclusion, nations should ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... arts would double the social problems.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'kind of', 'such as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256484149856 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.155619596542 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100864553314 0.0880659088768 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0634005763689 0.0497285424764 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0461095100865 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0951008645533 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.028818443804 0.0406280797675 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75595136079 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0374639769452 0.030933414821 121% => OK
Particles: 0.0028818443804 0.0016655270985 173% => OK
Determiners: 0.0662824207493 0.0997080785238 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0518731988473 0.0249443105267 208% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.014409221902 0.0148568991511 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2077.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 321.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.47040498442 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373831775701 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261682242991 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190031152648 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146417445483 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75595136079 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 55.7268669356 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0625 23.380412469 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8788789207 59.4972553346 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8125 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 23.380412469 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 46.2307242991 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.4347826087 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288209897329 0.391690518653 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102257619786 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0724590669741 0.077325440228 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.545396530181 0.547984918172 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191015242235 0.149214159877 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11252600509 0.161403998019 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564632862593 0.0892212321368 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.283349209882 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0974837989645 0.0692045440612 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18289445485 0.275328986314 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447084778086 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.