In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
In any field of inquiry, the experts always have better chance than the beginners to make important contributions. This is because the experts have developed better skills and techniques, have more thorough knowledge of the field and have access to different resources necessary for making any contribution.
To begin with, the experts, by definition, are well-trained with the skills and techniques that are necessary for making contribution to a field.For example, in the field of computer science, the technique of building sophisticated mathematical models is essential.Usually, experts in computer science have more experience of building math models and revising them when the results are not ideal. Also important is developing the programs to implement the math models. It is true that beginners may be more energetic and can program faster than the experts. But the experts are often better skilled in debugging the programs and optimising the algorithms.As illustrated in this example, experts who are more skilful in performing essential tasks in a field have a better chance to make contribution.
Another advantage of the experts is their thorough knowledge of the field.In most academic disciplines, it is essential to review the literature before starting one’s own research projects.Reviewing the literature can help one identify the gap of knowledge that needs to be filled and choose the most appropriate methods that have been successfully adopted in previous studies. With more time spent in the field, the experts are usually much more familiar with the literature than the beginners. In fact, the real experts are often the authors of some key articles in the literature.With their knowledge of the literature and past accomplishments in the field, they can identify the really important issues for inquiry and pursue the projects with better potential.
Finally, compared to the beginners, the experts have more resources in their disposal. Experts usually get more funding from the governments or other foundations than beginners because the experts had a record of successful projects that can predict their future success of the next project. he funding agencies would more likely accept a grant application from an expert based on the assumption that they are more likely to succeed. In addition, experts are usually the leaders of a team in which beginners work for them as PhD students or junior researchers. The team leaders usually take most of the credit for the contribution of the teams.
In conclusion, thanks to their better skills and more thorough knowledge as well as more resources available to them, the experts are in a better position to make important contributions than beginners.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-24 | reeya kiran | 50 | view |
- In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- People do many different things to stay healthy. what do you do for a good health? 70
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
- What qualities do you think a manager should possess in order to be successful in his/her job? 80
- People are more educated today than they were before. Agree/Disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...sary for making contribution to a field.For example, in the field of computer scien...
^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the technique of building sophisticated mathematical models is essential.Usually...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Usually
...cated mathematical models is essential.Usually, experts in computer science have more ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...g them when the results are not ideal. Also important is developing the programs to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
... programs and optimising the algorithms.As illustrated in this example, experts wh...
^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...s their thorough knowledge of the field.In most academic disciplines, it is essent...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Reviewing
...arting one's own research projects.Reviewing the literature can help one identify th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: With
... of some key articles in the literature.With their knowledge of the literature and p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...eir future success of the next project. he funding agencies would more likely acce...
^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'funds'.
Suggestion: funds
... future success of the next project. he funding agencies would more likely accept a gra...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'it is true', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255364806867 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.137339055794 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113733905579 0.0880659088768 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049356223176 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0278969957082 0.0444667217837 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12660944206 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0429184549356 0.0406280797675 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05674140009 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278969957082 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124463519313 0.0997080785238 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0128755364807 0.0249443105267 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150214592275 0.0148568991511 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2747.0 2732.02544248 101% => OK
No of words: 429.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.40326340326 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.424242424242 0.366273622748 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.333333333333 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.249417249417 0.200843997647 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167832167832 0.132149295362 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05674140009 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.48968727796 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.5678927208 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 28.6 23.380412469 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.69085802 59.4972553346 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.133333333 141.124799967 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6 23.380412469 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 61.9333333333 51.4728631049 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.98 1.64882698954 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562293463515 0.391690518653 144% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.186666445886 0.123202303941 152% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111473086514 0.077325440228 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.684624935593 0.547984918172 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172535432479 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.285604321004 0.161403998019 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938370041993 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.513552909668 0.385218514788 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.126268729103 0.0692045440612 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39620861292 0.275328986314 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520155035643 0.0653680567796 80% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.