Agree or disagree: It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
With the development of human's modern society, no one can turn a blind eye to the effects of a decent job on people's success. Actually, finding and commencing a worthwhile job is an inevitable and crucial juncture on people's lives. A simple recognition of this argument leads our discussion to the questions of how people can choose a job to be a successful person. Although some people adhere to this belief that work five days a week for shorter hours is useful, in my vantage point it is highly beneficial that work three days a week for long hours since you can save time for enhancing your knowledge and donate much time for personal life.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to work only three days is economizing their time for enhancing their knowledge. There is no doubt that nowadays, with the galloping rate of science and technology, jobs are very specialized and complicated so much so that everyone should enjoy a great amount of knowledge to be a professional person. Consequently, it is better that people have much time not only can they augment their skills, but also they inspire their motivation for reaching to the pinnacle in their jobs. Take a case of a person who work five days a week, for instance. Neither can he save time for improving his talent, nor does he become a skilled employee. As a result, improving ability is a significant merit of working 3 days a week.
The further subtle point is that improving personal lives is a advantage of saving time by working 3 days a week. Without a shadow of doubt, in modern era, people work hard to make progress and it is a requirement for them to economize their time for taking break from hectic life. Working 3 days a week provides an opportunity for people to spend much time for hanging out with their family and shed their stress with making communication with their friend. In this way, not only can they improve their energy, but also it is able them to enhance their efficiency in their jobs. As a consequence, developing life style can be considered as another advantage of working 3 days a week.
On put everything in a nutshell, a broad look over the main points and the discussions reveals the fact that working three days a week for long hours is highly beneficial because you can save time for improving your insight as well as donate much time for personal life. It is high time that we stopped overlooking that the only people who work 5 days a week can make progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Which would you choose: a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. 70
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person However some people think that is a good quality for a person 67
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 80
- 14 october 70
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neficial that work three days a week for long hours since you can save time for e...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...int is that improving personal lives is a advantage of saving time by working 3 d...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'no doubt', 'as a result', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259958071279 0.229887763892 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.153039832285 0.158761421928 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0775681341719 0.0866891130778 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0356394129979 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0670859538784 0.0685040099705 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127882599581 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0482180293501 0.0351676179071 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59745818422 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0251572327044 0.0309702414327 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0041928721174 0.00188951952338 222% => OK
Determiners: 0.100628930818 0.0887237588012 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.020964360587 0.0209618222197 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104821802935 0.0139019557991 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2487.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 444.0 408.028673835 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60135135135 5.86048508987 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.29954954955 0.338922669872 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.218468468468 0.251872472559 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.137387387387 0.174417080927 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105855855856 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59745818422 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466216216216 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.6825410094 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 26.1176470588 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6551315447 48.84282405 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.294117647 120.699889404 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1176470588 20.5533526081 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.644075263715 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.9644939057 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.70491803279 1.45489161554 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33169918856 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124605974854 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0909860639555 0.0752933317313 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483166568446 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147376671093 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131465014108 0.114077575197 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898533460163 0.0781384742642 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.441541337242 0.336927656856 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0883350127662 0.067059652881 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245505190709 0.210909579961 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507047938995 0.0618886996521 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.