Media plays an important role in making political news available to general public, in doing so they also make sure to follow certain standards for covering and providing that news. The claim is that emergence of online "blogosphere" and social media has significantly deteriorated the quality of news which we receive. However, in making this claim the author is completely neglecting the benefits of this emergence. In fact, this emergence has improved the reachability of the news and also has provided a shift from mundane formats and standards which well versed news channels follow.
Firstly, the advancement in technology has provided a common platform "web" where even general public can render their point of views. Those point of views might not align with everyone, but at least they provide a base for discussion or debate. For e.g if a person has written a blog about how he doesn't agree with the ideology of Donald Trump, now people might or might not agree with his views. They can comment their views and the discussion can be started on the topic. That discussion might or might not reach a conclusion but will provide the overall sentiments of general public, which in turn might help politicians to shape their ideology.
Secondly, media following certain standards and formats for showing news can become mundane and might not interest public as much. Media showing news is just a one way thing, even though they can interview general public for their views, it wouldn't be a representative of whole population. While in social media, the coverage is more, their is no limit on the number of people who can comment and represent their views. Some hard and fast rules can be followed by bloggers and social media too if that is the main concern.
Moreover, news provided by only news channels who are well versed in politics and mass communicaton can be problematic. Their views might be limited and might be molded by political parties. The news channels can be corrupted and only show news in favor of political party for monetary gains provided by those political parties. These news will only corrupt public and will never made them aware of the truth.
Conclusively, the emergence of "blogospher" and social media has not weakened the quality, in fact it has increased the availablity of news about political topics to general public and also has provided a platform to accomodate their poinit of view.
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United Stated.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 54
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e in making political news available to general public, in doing so they also make sure to fol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...mon platform 'web' where even general public can render their point of views. Those ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... person has written a blog about how he doesnt agree with the ideology of Donald Trump...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... will provide the overall sentiments of general public, which in turn might help politicians t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y thing, even though they can interview general public for their views, it wouldnt be a repres...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...view general public for their views, it wouldnt be a representative of whole population...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... in social media, the coverage is more, their is no limit on the number of people who...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'These newses'?
Suggestion: This news; These newses
...ns provided by those political parties. These news will only corrupt public and will never...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...blity of news about political topics to general public and also has provided a platform to acc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'at least', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24672489083 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.155021834061 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0786026200873 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.061135371179 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0393013100437 0.0444667217837 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106986899563 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0545851528384 0.0406280797675 134% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86885945017 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0109170305677 0.030933414821 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0873362445415 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0458515283843 0.0249443105267 184% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0152838427948 0.0148568991511 103% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2467.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 407.0 452.878318584 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06142506143 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346437346437 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253071253071 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184275184275 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115479115479 0.132149295362 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86885945017 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479115479115 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 52.0158429464 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.6111111111 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5381304247 59.4972553346 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.055555556 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 47.9182364182 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.59829059829 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467158229985 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151269312936 0.123202303941 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0624842717116 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.577255467408 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135260128196 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186039821599 0.161403998019 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116373475747 0.0892212321368 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267723037262 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0422345582544 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316172501718 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11084988006 0.0653680567796 170% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.